Pedagogų asmenybės bruožų įtaka savideterminacijai
| Author |
|---|
Juodkūnė, Inga |
| Date | Volume | Issue |
|---|---|---|
2015 | 117 | 1 |
Pedagogų asmenybės įtaka ugdymui yra labai svarbi. Tam, kad būtų galima tiksliau nuspėti ir paaiškinti pedagogų elgseną, darbo rezultatus, pirmiausia būtina atsakyti į klausimą, kaip pedagogo asmenybės bruožai prognozuoja jų motyvaciją, t. y. ar asmenybės bruožai gali turėti įtakos pedagogo motyvacinei orientacijai. Asmenybės bruožai šiame straipsnyje įvardijami Didžiuoju penketu (NEO-FFI, Costa, McCrae, 2012), o motyvacinė orientacija (GMS-28; Guay et al., 2003) yra apibrėžiama remiantis savideterminacijos teorija (angl. Self-Determination theory, SDT). Tyrimo tikslas – ištirti pedagogų asmenybės bruožų įtaką motyvacinei orientacijai (SDT kontekste). Tyrimo metu tikrinama hipotezė – asmenybės bruožai daro įtaką savideterminacijai. Tyrime dalyvavo 241 pedagogas: iš jų 32 (13,3 proc.) vyrai, 206 (85,5 proc.) moterys, 3 (1,2 proc.) nenurodė lyties. Tyrimo rezultatai parodė, kad ne visi Didžiojo penketo bruožai turi įtakos pedagogų savideterminacijai. Taip pat prieita prie išvados, kad asmenybės bruožai didesnę įtaką daro vidinei motyvacijai ir kartu savideterminacijai nei išorinei motyvacijai ir motyvacijos stokai.
motivaition from the hierarchical model of motivation developed by Vallerand R. (1997). The global motivation is described as a general tendency to base one’s actions on intrinsic/extrinsic motives (Vallerand, 2000). The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between teachers’ personality traits and global motivational orientation (in SDT context), wich consists of internal, external motivation and amotivation. The hypothesis is that teachers’ personality traits predict self-determination. Participants: the sample consisted of 241 Lithuanian teachers: 32 of them (13.3 %) men, 206 (85.5 %) women, 3 (1.2 %) respondents’ gender were undisclosed. The age of respondents varied from 23 up to 75 age (M = 44.5; SD = 10.5). In the study were used two measuring instruments: personality traits questionnaire (NEO – FFI, Costa, McCrae, 2012) and the global motivation scale (GMS – 28; Guay et al., 2003). In the research was used Lithuanian version of Global motivation scale and it’s psycho-metric characteristics (Urbanavičiūtė, Kairys, Juodkūnė, Liniauskaitė; 2013). The relationship between teachers‘ personality traits and motivational orientations, self-determination were analyzed using multiple linear regression model. The results show that the hypothesis - teachers’ personality traits predict self-determination, confirmed in part. Personality traits explains 21 % of the test variance. Three personality traits (openness, extraversion, neuroticism) have the greatest influence to predict overall index of self-determination (SDI). The extraversion and openness have a positive influence on SDI and neuroticism – negative. Agreeableness and consciousness don‘t influence on the index of selfdetermination. The results show that personality traits can predict more accurately the intrinsic motivation rather than external motivation and amotivation. Extraversion, as personal trait, from all five basic personal traits has a biggest influence on self- determination. Extraversion has influence on orientations of inner motivation (To know, To experience and To achieve) and external motivation (regulation and identification). For orientations of external motivation- Introjection and amotivation - extraversion don’t have a direct influence. Openness to experience have a direct influence on inner motivational orientation To know and To experience. For external motivation openness to experience don’t have an influence, but this personal trait can predict amotivation (identified negative direct influence). Agreeableness personal trait predicts one of inner motivation types- To achieve (positive direction of influence), external- Regulation (negative direcion of influence) and lack of motivation (positive direction of influence). Personal trait of awareness has influence on prediction of inner motivation, but not on external motivation. Awareness has direct influence on orientations of inner motivation To know and To achieve. Neuroticism has direct infuence on general self- determination level, but not on the different orientations of internal and external motivation. Influence of personal traits for teachers self-determination, additional indepenent variables: respondenst’ age and working expierence, help to explain more acurately (higher R2 coefficient). Age and workig experience of pedagogical work don’t have influence on prediction of inner motivation, but it makes influence on external motivation (regulation and introjection.) Limitation. Observing all the results of the research, it’s important to mention that main limitation of this research is short version of Big Five questionnaire. Because of that reason, explaining results were questions about what specific characterists, who belong to one or another trait, have a direct influence to the results. Another important moment is in regresion models, without personal traits independent variables were chosen age and working experience of teachers. But, to make a final conclusion about age influence to motivation, would be more objective to lean on results of longitudinal research.