Vytautas Magnus University Research Management System (VDU CRIS)





3. Mokslo žurnalai / Research Journals

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/261291

Browse

Search Results

Now showing1 - 3 of 3
  • Item type:Publication,
    Argumentavimas: samprata ir didaktinės perspektyvos (1)
    [Argumentation: concept and didactic opportunities (1)]
    research article[2007][S4][S007][7]
    Pedagogika / Pedagogy, 2007, vol. 86, p. 135-141

    Secondly, the teachers of the subject feel that they are not qualified or competent enough to teach their students the skills of writing essays. A number of teachers refuse to prepare students for reasoning about social and existential issues; instead, they focus exclusively on literature, language and culture, because they are trained in the literary tradition. Thirdly, the survey of national achievements of Lithuanian schoolchildren demonstrates that the schoolchildren find it especially difficult to give reasons or arguments in written. Excellent argumentation (A level) was presented by 4, 3 per cent schoolchildren of the 8th grade (in the year of 2004) and by 7 per cent schoolchildren of the 10th grade (in the year of 2005). The present article makes a review of essential concepts of reasoning, exposition and argumentation. Argumentation theory and its didactic approaches have also been considered. The vision of the application of the argumentation as a product, a process and a procedure for didactic purposes has been presented.

      46
  • Item type:Publication,
    Argumentavimas tekstų tipų sistemoje
    [Argumentative text in the system of text types]
    research article[2005][S4][H004][5]
    Žmogus ir žodis / Man and the Word, 2005, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 17-21

    We have defined argumentative text in terms of text typology. The text type identification criteria have been discussed in the article: some subtypes of argumentation according to the mode of thinking have been analysed...

      56
  • Item type:Publication,
    Uncertainty and modernity: why is it so difficult to practice rhetoric today?
    [Netikrumas ir modernybė: kodėl retorikos praktika šiandien tokia sunki?]
    research article[2016]
    Nicolas, Loïc
    Darbai ir dienos / Deeds and Days, 2016, no. 66, p. 167-175

    Šis straipsnis atveria naują retorikos veidą ir tai leidžia geriau suprasti ne tik didžiulę jos vertę, bet ir jėgą, o per tai ir retorikos meno ligi šiol vis dar kurstomą aistrą, pavydą ir susidomėjimą. Mano siekis yra susieti kalbėjimo kaip argumentavimo praktiką su naudojimusi politine laisve. Ši praktika ryškinama kaip būdas išsilaisvinti ir pažadinti savo sąžinę rizikuojant atsisakyti įrodymų ir tikrumų. Retorika – tai ne tik menas kalbėti gerai ir išraiškingai siekiant įtikinti, tai visų pirma tam tikras būdas mąstyti, netgi kelionė į laisvę vedančiu keliu, kurį turime, manau, ištirti iš naujo.

      121  77