Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35910
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Berkmanas, Tomas
Title: Motives in support of judicial activism : critique and ethics of restrained adjudication as an alternative
Is part of: Baltic journal of law & politics [elektroninis išteklius]. Warsaw : Versita, Vol. 2, no. 1 (2009)
Extent: p. 112-134
Date: 2009
Keywords: Teisminis aktyvumas;Teisėta interpretacija;Politinė valstybės struktūra;Judicial activism;Legal interpretation;Restrained adjudication;Justice John Marshall;Political framework of the state
Abstract: The paper concentrates, from the critical perspective, on two general ideological themes used to support and welcome judicial activism mainly in the jurisprudence of the highest level courts of the United States and Lithuania. This task is relevant in light of the judicial activism spreading in court practices, as well as its clear embrace in the academic community of Lithuania. The first theme focuses on the practice and ideology of Justice John Marshall. It is rather evident that the Marshallian ideas and activities form an ideological basis for an active and politically powerful constitutional court. However, due regard should be paid to the critique of the Marshallian heritage. The other theme is built on the juxtaposition of reality and the law as text, the former being much more complicated. This allegedly supports the theses either that adjudication could not avoid taking the form of precedent (the creation of law rather than the interpretation of law), or that judicial interpretation is meant to fill the gaps or fix inconsistencies in the legal text (the so-called thesis of interpretative sufficiency). However, due regard should be paid to the consequences of the realization of both theses to the political framework of the state. This article attempts to fill in these aforementioned gaps in critical attention with compensatory critique, as well as to suggest an alternative approach to the propaganda of judicial activism - an ethics of restrained adjudication
Internet: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076-009-0007-7
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/35910/1/ISSN2029-0454_2009_V_2_1.PG_112-134.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35910
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076-009-0007-7
Affiliation(s): Teisės fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 2009, vol. 2, iss. 1
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml10.66 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Sep 5, 2019

Download(s)

36
checked on Sep 5, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.