Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32446
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Stonys, Juozas;Bilius, Mindaugas
Title: Laikino nuosavybės teisės apribojimo problematika baudžiamajame procese: optimalaus sprendimo beieškant
Is part of: Teisės apžvalga [elektroninis išteklius] = Law review. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2016, nr. 2(14)
Extent: p. 343-359
Date: 2016
Note: Straipsnis buvo publikuotas recenzuojamame mokslinių straipsnių rinkinyje „Baudžiamoji justicija ir verslas“
Keywords: Nuosavybės teisių apribojimas;Baudžiamasis procesas;Nuosavybės teisės apsauga;Property rights;Criminal Procedure Code;Restriction of the property rights;Human right of the inviolability of property
Abstract: Straipsnyje, įvertinus pernelyg ilgus laikino nuosavybės teisės apribojimo taikymo terminus, dėl ko tam tikri nuosavybės objektai praranda vertę, atsižvelgiant į Lietuvos bei užsienio šalių teismų praktiką ir teisinę doktriną, atskleidžiamos praktinės problemos, kylančios taikant laikiną nuosavybės teisės apribojimą ir siūlomi jų sprendimo būdai
The question of the balance between the protection and the coercive measures of the property rights still remains relevant to the Courts or prosecutors each time dealing with the issues of applying temporary limitation of the property rights. Lithuanian law establishes several ways of affecting property rights: it could be a coercive measure under the Criminal Procedure Code or a penal sanction under the Criminal Code. Temporary limitation of the property rights as a coercive measure is related to the human right of the inviolability of property. Therefore any restriction of the property rights should be imposed as an ultima ratio measure, without which it would not be possible to achieve the required goals in the criminal procedure. It should be noted that even if justifying the use of the coercive measure to achieve the required goals, the right of the inviolability of property is violated if such measure is applied too long or when imposition of such measure is disproportionate. It is worth mentioning that the coercive measure - temporary limitation of the property rights could be applied even during the pre-trial investigation when there is no Court’s decision about the person’s guilt. For such reason the imposition of such coercive measure should be strictly measured. Because of fast advancement of technology and digital products in today’s world, the circle of the objects of the ownership becomes wider, broadening the meaning of the property. Accordingly, the coercive measures, directed to the restriction of the property rights, should adapt to the changing environment.[...]
Internet: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32446
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/32446/1/ISSN2029-4239_2016_N_2_14.PG_343-359.pdf
https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/32446
https://doi.org/10.7220/2029-4239.14.20
Affiliation(s): Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie LR VRM, Klaipėdos apygardos valdyba
Teisės fakultetas
Viešosios teisės katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Teisės apžvalga / Law Review 2016, nr. 2(14)
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml10.71 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

122
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Download(s)

192
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.