Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32256
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis kituose recenzuojamuose leidiniuose / Article in other peer-reviewed editions (S5)
Field of Science: Politikos mokslai / Political sciences (S002)
Author(s): Kiveris, Almantas
Title: Ideologinių takoskyrų raiška parlamentinių Lietuvos partijų Seimo rinkimų programose 1992-2004 metais
Other Title: The expression of ideological cleavages in electoral platforms of Lithuanian parties in the general elections from 1992 to through 2004
Is part of: Jaunųjų politologų almanachas. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 2 (2006)
Extent: p. 102-127
Date: 2006
Note: Jaunųjų politologų almanachas nuo Nr. 3 pakeitė pavadinimą į Politikos mokslų almanachas
Keywords: Ideologija;Parlamentas;Partijos;Seimas;Rinkimai;Programos;Lietuva;Ideology;Parliament;Parties;Elections;Cleavages;Lithuania
ISBN: 9955121270
Abstract: Straipsnio tema yra viena iš klasikinių politologinių temų. Politinių partijų analizei Lietuvos politologinėje literatūroje yra skirta nemažai tekstų, tačiau politinių partijų analizė yra visada aktuali. Straipsnyje pristatoma teorinė ideologinių takoskyrų samprata. Apibrėžiami šešių ideologinių takoskyrų pagrindiniai bruožai, kuriais remiantis analizuojamos parlamentinių Lietuvos partijų 1992-2004 m. Seimo rinkimų programų nuostatos, atitinkančios pasirinktus kriterijus. Straipsnyje nustatoma ideologinių takoskyrų raiška parlamentinių Lietuvos partijų 1992-2004 m. Seimo rinkimų programose
The goal of the article is to identify the salience of ideological cleavages in electoral platforms of Lithuanian parties in the general elections of 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004. That is, the aim is to evaluate the extent of expression of these cleavages. Only few parties, that is the so-called relevant parties are analysed. The theoretical framework for this analysis is the classification of dimensions of ideology provided by Arend Lijphart. The work of Giovanni Sartori and Ronald Inglehart is studied in the article as well. The main conclusion is that there is a possibility for six various cleavages – socio-economic, religiuos, cultural-ethnic, urban- rural, cleavage of foreign policy and postmaterialist-materialist cleavage. During the elections in 1992 the parties defended rightwing positions in most of the dimensions of socio-economic cleavage. There was no cleavage. During the elections in 1996 and in 2000 the cleavage deepened because the parties began to express their right-wing or left-wing inclinations more clearly. On the other hand, during the elections of 2004 the cleavage remained but the ideological rigidity changed for the worse: some right-wing parties, namely the coalition of Rolandas Paksas, adopted left-wing attitude. Religious cleavage was salient during the elections in 1992 and in 1996 because the Christian Democrats succeeded to win the seats following clerical strategy. Their opponents were the Social-Democrats which defended secular positions. However, the elections of the year 2000 and the year 2004 proved the decline of the longstanding cleavage. Two aspects could be analyzed with respect to the cultural- ethnic cleavage: dominant culture vs. minority culture and nationalism vs. cosmopolitanism. Lithuanian parties always agitated for preservation of the culture of national minorities.[...]
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/32256/3/ISSN1822-9212_2006_V_2.PG_102-127.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32256
Affiliation(s): Politikos mokslų ir diplomatijos fakult.
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Jaunųjų politologų almanachas 2006, [t.] 2
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

47
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

37
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.