Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31814
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Šaulauskas, Marius Povilas
Title: Analitikos–hermeneutikos kontroversija (Retrospekcijos bruožai)
Other Title: Retrospecting analytic / hermeneutic controversy
Date: 2005
Abstract: and empiricism, while contemporary attempts to reinterpret these basic methodological approaches under subsuming post-modern vocabulary also revoice their predecessor, Kantian project of transcendental idealism. Therefore, postmodern discourse first of all stands as a persist-ence of bipolar modern epistemology and, by the šame token, of analytic/hermeneutic controversy. Second, the centrai ąuestion of hermeneutics of how to properly cope with specifically human world of meaning, the problem of understanding, has its analytical counterpart, the centrai ąuestion of analytic philosophy of how to delineate the proper epistemological borders separating natūrai and hu-man universe, the problem of demarcation. Thus the retrospect of analytic/hermeneutic controversy unfolds as a history of ttvofold articulation of the topography of different kinds of knowledge and their epistemic value. Third, an adequate retrospection of analytic/hermeneutic controversy endemically entails and is underpinned by the metaphilosophi-cal problematics, focused on the ąuestion of the specificity, limits and demarcation lines of the philosophical discourse itself.
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/31814
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31814
Appears in Collections:Darbai ir dienos / Deeds and Days 2005, nr. 41

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

80
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.