Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Politikos mokslai / Politic sciences (S002)
Author(s): Mažeikis, Gintautas
Title: ES KI ir komunikacinio veiksmo Lietuvoje kritika
Other Title: EU CI and critique of communicative reason in Lithuania
Is part of: Meno istorija ir kritika = Art history & criticism. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 2013, [T.] 9 : Sacrum et publicum
Extent: p. 111-125
Date: 2013
Keywords: Savispektaklizacija;Komunikacija;Svarstomoji demokratija;Savarankiškumas;Kūrybinis naikinimas;Neviešpataujantis savarankiškumas;Atvira įvairovei visuomenė;Self-spectaclization;Communication;Deliberative democracy;Self-reliance;Creative disruption;Open society for diversities
Abstract: The aim of the article is to critically analyze communication of public sector of Creative industries (CI) and Cultural and Creative Sector (CCS) in Lithuania. The main attention is paid to explanation of important concepts of EU documents from the point of view of Critical discourse analysis and Critical hermeneutics: making of affects, an economy of experience, creative disruption, multiplicity of memories ... The article considers the Green Book and The Impact of Culture on Creativity and other EU and Lithuanian documents, their ideas and relationships with power, economy and creativity in a perspective of communicative reason. The object of critique is analysis of the case of Fluxus ministry (NGO in Kaunas) and growth of tendencies of meritocracy. I interpret Critical discourse analysis and Critical hermeneutics in a way they were developed in the Critical theory and in the works of Jurgen Habermas devoted to analysis of communicative action and communicative reason. My interpretation of the role of dialogue and some concepts of poststructuralism where I support theories of M. Bakchtin’s tradition differs from Habermas interpretation. Contemporary Critical theory includes not only former Cultural philosophy, but also elements of critique of Cultual industries (tradition of M. Horkheimer and T. Adorno), British Cultural studies and political economy devoted to the questions of CI. Besides, for interpretation of EU documents I use a number of concepts related to the poststructuralism: direct self-government, deliberative democracy, critics of nomenclature and meritocracy, self-spectaclization and creation of open society for diversities. [...]
Affiliation(s): Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Meno istorija ir kritika / Art History & Criticism 2013, nr. 9
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml9.82 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Aug 16, 2019


checked on Aug 16, 2019

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.