Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/30989
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis kituose recenzuojamuose leidiniuose / Article in other peer-reviewed editions (S5)
Field of Science: Sociologija / Sociology (S005)
Author(s): Čiurlytė, Lina;Večkienė, Nijolė
Title: Šeimos išsaugojimo galimybės : sprendimų priėmimas galių santykių kontekste
Other Title: The possibility of preserving the family : decision making within context of power relationship
Is part of: Socialinis darbas. Patirtis ir metodai = Social work. Experience and methods. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 2(2) 2008
Extent: p. 87-107
Date: 2008
Keywords: Šeima;Galia;Santykia;Family;Power;Relationship
Abstract: Šeimos atvejo peržiūra – sprendimo priėmimo dėl vaiko ateities šeimoje modelis, atkeliavęs iš Didžiosios Britanijos. Peržiūroje dalyvauja skirtingų sričių specialistai. Esant tarpdisciplininei situacijai, susikuria įtampų laukas tarp socialinių paslaugų teikėjų, nes kiekvienas jų į peržiūrą ateina su savais tikslais bei funkcijomis. Tyrimo tikslas – atskleisti galios santykių ir sprendimo priėmimo sąsajas šeimos atvejo peržiūros procese. Tyrimui atlikti naudotas kokybinis aprašomasis tyrimo metodas. Informacija tyrimui surinkta naudojant pusiau struktūruotą interviu. Surinktiems duomenims apdoroti naudotas temų analizės instrumentas. Jei šeimos atvejo peržiūros procese pasirenkamas komunikacinis modelis, siekiant etiško sprendimo priėmimo, komunikacija vyksta dialogu, jei dominuoja galių modelis, sprendimą gali priimti vienas žmogus. Pasirinkus globą kaip alternatyvą, rizikuojama dar labiau pakenkti visiems šeimos nariams
According to M. Payne (1996), agencies, providing social services, are in the process of consistent alternation. These changes take place in order to react to people demand on social services. The review of family example is the model of decision making over child’s future in the family, which came over from Great Britain. The review is attended by specialists of various areas. Because of interdisciplinary situation, the tension field occurs among providers of social services, because every of them comes to the review with his/her own purposes and functions. From the theoretical perspective powers are being described as the mean of individuals’ regulation. To manage means to model activity field of other individuals, to put it in other words, powers are proportion of strengths, when some strength dominates, and the others comply. The purpose of the research is to disclose the links between power relationships and decision making in the review process of family case. The following tasks of the work were raised in order to achieve the mentioned purpose: 1. To discuss political, juridical and theoretical aspects of powers relationships, while highlighting the context of decision making over family future in the context of review process. 2. To review institutional aspects of powers relationships, grounding competencies and roles of social worker in the review process of family case. 3. To disclose the links between power relationship and decisions over child’s future in the review process of family case. The research is accomplished, using qualitative descriptive research method. The information for this research was collected using semi-structural interview. In order to process collected data, instrument of themes analysis was used. The research was attended by 11 respondents. The results of research.[...]
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/30989/1/ISSN2029-0470_2008_N_2_2.PG_87-107.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/30989
Affiliation(s): Letonikos centras
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Socialinis darbas. Patirtis ir metodai / Social Work. Experience and Methods 2008, nr. 2(2)
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

71
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

31
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.