Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/30703
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Istorija ir archeologija / History and archaeology (H005)
Author(s): Lasinskas, Povilas
Title: Senosios rusų valstybės susikūrimas (XX a. istoriografijos bruožai)
Other Title: The issue of the formation of the ancient Russian state in the 20th century historiography
Is part of: Česlovo Milošo skaitymai = Czeslaw Milosz’s readings. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2013, [T.] 6 : „Gimtoji Europa“: erdvė, mintis, žodis
Extent: p. 162-174
Date: 2013
Note: e-ISSN 2029-8692
Keywords: Rusios istorija;XX a. istoriografija;Ankstyvasis feodalizmas;Russian history;20th century historiography;Early feudalism
Abstract: The objective of the research on the formation of the ancient Russian state has been to describe the character of the economic and communal relations of the East Slavs at the time of the state formation. The 20th century historiographers have considered the formation of the ancient Russian state as the result of lengthy consolidation process of the East Slavs that took place in the 2nd half of the 1st millennium of our era. It has been proved that the Normans did not have a significant influence on the formation of the East Slavic state. Most scholars have recognized the existence of early feudal system. The wide ethnical illustration of the East Slavs has been presented, the place of the East Slavs in the system of the European nations has been determined, and their culture and daily life have been researched. The 20th century historiographers have tended to advance the genesis of the statehood of ancient Rus by several ages. The first steps in this direction were done by Grekov and Rybakov and some Lithuanian historians used the same path. Thus, the advancement of the statehood in accordance with the results of the analysis of social-economic development is characteristic to historiography. At the same time it cannot be left unnoticed that the researchers of the ancient Russian history have not reached the unanimous opinion on some principal issues. Though the diversity of opinions helps to cover more aspects of the ancient Slavs life, the contradictory conceptions (about patrimonies and state feudalism, feudal-national, pre-feudal and slaveholding statehood) often cannot be accepted. Perhaps the truth lies somewhere in the middle or one of these conceptions is more correct. At first glance, it may seem that these disagreements exist due to the lack of sources and that their further accumulation will allow explaining a lot, eliminating the disagreements.[...]
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/30703/1/ISSN2029-8692_2013_N_6.PG_162_174.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/30703
Affiliation(s): Politikos mokslų ir diplomatijos fakult.
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Česlovo Milošo centras
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications
Česlovo Milošo skaitymai 2013, nr. 6

Files in This Item:
marc.xml8.64 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats

Page view(s)

190
checked on Mar 30, 2020

Download(s)

314
checked on Mar 30, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.