Sisteminio mąstymo įtaka valdymo sprendimams
Date | Issue | Start Page | End Page |
---|---|---|---|
2010 | 54 | 85 | 96 |
Straipsnyje analizuojama, kokie organizacijų bruožai ir vadovų savybės lemia organizacijų projektavimo būdą kaip vieną iš valdymo sprendimų. Aprašomi tyrimai, kurių pagalba buvo ieškoma dėsningumų tarp organizacijų pobūdžio, vadovų sisteminio mąstymo ir jų polinkio rinktis tam tikrus vadybinius sprendimus bei informacines verslo valdymo sistemas.
Scientists of systemology propose SBMS (Soft of Business Management System) just as a computerintegrated tool and recommend to project an organization using a methodology of minds activity. However the quality, particularity and usefulness of SBMS induce to review the scientists’ attitudes. Senselessness of the organizations systems leads to the waste of synergy and insufficient management. A person gifted with systematic intellection can organize a company as a system, including all components that are important according the system unit. A person who has an ability of systematic intellection is able to organize a company as a system without separating components and it is significant for the system as a whole. The systematic attitude to organization management consists of 6 competences: dynamic intellection; active interaction; systematic logic; process orientation; perpetual learning; perception of mental models. Principles of systematic thinking help organizations to compete successfully in the market. There is not easy to understand what organizational features and personal abilities of managers determine the choice of the organizations project method. The disclosed regularities can help to understand better the aspects of organization project management. It is important to check relationships between methodology of minds activity and SBMS (Soft of Business Management System). The article analyses organizations’ features and managers’ characteristics that determine the method of organizations projection and enables to look for regularities that allow better understanding of the aspects of organizations projection. Demographics of the respondents (law status of companies, gender, age, education and etc.) shows similarities of the real situation in Lithuania. [...].