Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/92054
Type of publication: Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or / and Scopus (S1)
Field of Science: Agronomija / Agronomy (A001)
Author(s): Šarauskis, Egidijus;Romaneckas, Kęstutis;Kumhála, František;Kriaučiūnienė, Zita
Title: Energy use and carbon emission of conventional and organic sugar beet farming
Is part of: Journal of cleaner production. Oxford : Elsevier, 2018, vol. 201
Extent: p. 428-438
Date: 2018
Keywords: Energy use indicator;Carbon emission;Sugar beet;Tillage;Weed control;Farm size
Abstract: The efficiency and environmental impact of sugar beet production can be measured using a variety of energy consumption and carbon emission indicators, respectively. The goal of the present study was to analyse the energy and carbon emission indicators of sugar beet production systems that involved different farming methods and farm sizes. More specifically, we analysed the effects of five tillage practices used in conventional farming systems (deep ploughing, shallow ploughing, chiselling, discing, and no tillage), four non-chemical weed control practices used in organic farming systems (inter-row loosening, inter-row cutting and mulching, smothering with white mustard, and thermal control), and five farm sizes (2, 10, 20, 40, and 80 ha). For conventional sugar beet production, the greatest efficiency (efficiency ratio of 9.59, specific energy of 0.41MJ kg 1, and energy productivity of 2.41 kgMJ 1) were obtained by disc harrow soil loosening on 80-ha farms. For organic production, the lowest energy input (25862 MJ ha 1) and specific energy (0.46 MJ kg 1) and the greatest yield (55.82 t ha 1), energy efficiency ratio (8.21), and energy efficiency (22.16 kg MJ 1) were obtained using inter-row loosening on 80-ha farms. The most environmentally friendly conventional farming process, in terms of carbon emissions (carbon input of 825.7 kg ha 1, carbon emission ratio of 19.75), involved no tillage technology on 80-ha farms, whereas the most environmentally friendly organic farming process (carbon input of 4606 kg ha 1, carbon emission ratio of 4.85) involved inter-row loosening. Farm size also influenced efficiency and environmental impact; as farm size increased from very small (2 ha) to large (80 ha), the total energy input for the conventional and organic farming systems increased from 6.5 to 10.9% and from 7.9 to 9.6%, respectively, and the carbon input decreased from 9.9 to 14.9% and from 3.1 to 4.0%
Internet: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618324132
Affiliation(s): Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Žemės ūkio akademija
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml9.31 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 5

6
checked on Feb 27, 2021

Page view(s)

64
checked on Feb 4, 2020

Download(s)

8
checked on Feb 4, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.