Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/91297
Type of publication: conference paper
Type of publication (PDB): Tezės kituose recenzuojamuose leidiniuose / Theses in other peer-reviewed publications (T1e)
Field of Science: Sociologija / Sociology (S005)
Author(s): Merkys, Gediminas;Bubelienė, Daiva;Čiučiulkienė, Nijolė
Title: Satisfaction of rural population with public services in the regions: analysis of educational indicators
Is part of: Rural development 2017 [elektroninis išteklius]: Bioeconomy challenges : the 8th international scientific conference, 23-24th November, 2017, Aleksandras Stulginskis University : abstracts book. Akademija : Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2017
Extent: p. 304-306
Date: 2017
Note: Puslapiai nurodyti pagal pataisytą leidinį
Keywords: Rural development;societal monitoring;rural population satisfaction;educational services
ISBN: 9786094491238
Abstract: The key idea of the well-being concept reveals the main guidelines for societal monitoring as it tries to answer the question about how well the needs of people in a society are met across various domains - the physical, economic, social, environmental, emotional, and spiritual – as well as individuals’ evaluations of their own lives and the way that their society operates (Gilbert, Colley, Roberts, 2016). The efforts to measure community satisfaction have never lost their relevance as they are directed towards the development of systematic approach to societal monitoring. The presented research also aims to complement to this approach. Its theoretical concepts are: "rural-city differences"; "Objective and subjective quality of life", "Public services and their quality", "Measurement of satisfaction with public services"; "Education indicators". Research methodology is centered around a standardized questionnaire for population covering 193 primary indicators, which measure satisfaction with various public services: health, social security, culture, public transport, utilities, environment, recreation and sport, public communication, education, etc. The methodology projects the following quantitative aspects: the percentage of service benchmarking and the percentage of ranked service (PR) in the rate of 193 positions. The advantage of the methodology is that it transforms the indicators, which are not comparable in terms of conceptual and official statistics, into relatively homogeneous indicators of opinion. The latter can already be compared and ranked. The methodology is very functional when it comes to identifying: (a) those public services that are subjectively perceived as poor, good or medium; b) it is necessary to look at the satisfaction of the services of a particular sector in different district areas, towns and villages.[...]
Internet: http://www.ruraldevelopment.lt/doc/SANTRAUKOS_%20GERAS.pdf
Affiliation(s): Kauno kolegija
Lietuvos aukštųjų mokyklų profesinių sąjungų susivienijimas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Žemės ūkio akademija
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml7.31 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

37
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.