Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/85365
Type of publication: Straipsnis recenzuojamoje Lietuvos tarptautinės konferencijos medžiagoje / Article in peer-reviewed Lithuanian international conference proceedings (P1e)
Field of Science: Mechanikos inžinerija / Mechanical Engineering (T009)
Author(s): Strakšas, Anicetas;Jurpalis, Kalikstas
Title: Comparative research on peas harvesting technologies
Is part of: Proceedings of the international conference. , No. 11 (2006)
Extent: p. 77-82
Date: 2006
Note: Numerio antraštė: Development of agricultural technologies and technical means in ecological and energetic aspects : 14-15 September 2006
Abstract: Traditional cutting-threshing, windrow harvesting and stripping-threshing technologies of peas harvesting have been researched. The combines harvesters SK-5, SR 500 and JK-3 “Nemunas” (semi-hanger), the mower ŽRB-4.2A for cutting the peas into windrow, the sampler of windrows A54-102 and an experimental stripper header for combine SR 500 were used in the tests. The greatest losses (approximately 8 %) of peas were when peas have been harvested by windrow technology method. While threshing dry windrows of peas by combine SK-5, approximately 9 % of peas were shattered (mostly into haft part). It was established, that the highest efficiency was when peas were harvested applying traditional crop harvesting technology by Finn combine SR 500. The semi-hanger combine JK-3 “Nemunas” is workable for peas harvesting. However approximately 6 % of grain is shattering and total grain losses amount over 7 % of all grain yield. The lesser grain defilement in the combine tank for grains was when peas were harvested by combine SR 500 and the least defilement was when peas were harvested by combine SK-5. The germinating ability of peas seeds was approximately equable applying all investigated technologies of peas harvesting except stripping-threshing technology (when only stripped pods have been threshed). According energetic indices, the windrow harvesting was less effective method (the greatest diesel and labour input). The highest efficiency was achieved applying stripping-threshing technology: the output of combine increased twice and approximately 30 % of fuel consumption was saved
Internet: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/85365
Affiliation(s): Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Žemės ūkio akademija
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml5.89 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

32
checked on Dec 11, 2019

Download(s)

6
checked on Dec 11, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.