Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/62183
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Žibėnienė, Gintautė
Title: Kompetentingo dėstytojo samprata, Lietuvos edukologijos universiteto kūno kultūros specialybės pirmo kurso studentų požiūriu
Other Title: Conception of the competent teacher according to the first-year physical education students of Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences
Is part of: Sporto mokslas, 2017, nr. 1, p. 16-23
Date: 2017
Keywords: Studentai;Kompetentingumas;Kompetentingas dėstytojas;Students;Competence;Qualified teacher of university
Abstract: Straipsnyje pristatoma Lietuvos edukologijos universiteto (toliau – LEU) kūno kultūros pirmo kurso studentų kompetentingo dėstytojo samprata. Tiriant kūno kultūros pirmo kurso studentų kokybiškų studijų sampratą ir lūkesčius, studentai kaip svarbius komponentus akcentavo dėstytojų kompetentingumą, profesinę patirtį, pedagogui svarbias asmenines savybes (sąžiningumą, supratingumą, gerumą). Tačiau liko neaišku, kas, studentų nuomone, yra „kompetentingas dėstytojas“. Kūno kultūros studentai – būsimieji mokytojai, todėl svarbu analizuoti, kokį dėstytoją jie laiko kompetentingu, nes galimai tai jų kaip būsimųjų mokytojų vizija. Straipsnyje keliama problema, kad nepakankamai aišku, kokį dėstytoją studentai laiko kompetentingu. Empirinio tyrimo tikslas – atskleisti, remiantis LEU kūno kultūros pirmo kurso studentų nuomone, koks dėstytojas yra kompetentingas. [...]
Article presents conception of competent (university) teacher according to the first year physical education students of Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences (LUES). By analyzing the concept of quality studies of first year PE students of of LUES, eight qualitative categories have been singled out: study outcomes, the structure of study programme, study process, a favourable educational environment, material and methodical resources, lecturers, the accessibility of studies and a possibility to be employed, prestige of institutions and studies. However, we still don’t know who is “qualified teacher” in the eyes of our students. Also we shouldn’t forget that PE students are future PE teachers. So it’s really important to analyze who are qualified teacher and what students are thinking about it, because it’s could be their, as future teacher’s, vision. Article identifies some problems as who is qualified teacher in students eyes, what level of excellence qualified teacher must demonstrate and what skills he must have etc. The purpose of the article was to reveal the qualified teacher conception of the students of the first year of studies of PE at Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences. [...]
Internet: http://dx.doi.org/10.15823/sm.2017.3
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/62183
Appears in Collections:Sporto mokslas, 2017, Nr. 1

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Mar 29, 2020

Download(s)

92
checked on Mar 29, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.