Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/61576
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science (S1)
Field of Science: Miškotyra / Forestry (A004)
Author(s): Angelstam, Per;Manton, Michael;Khaulyak, Olga;Naumov, Vladimir;Pedersen, Simen;Stryamets, Natalie;Törnblom, Johan;Valasiuk, Sviataslau;Yamelynets, Taras
Title: Knowledge production and learning for sustainable forest landscapes: the European continent's West and East as a laboratory
Is part of: Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал. Архангельск : Архангельский государственный технический университет, 2019, № 1
Extent: p. 9-31
Date: 2019
Keywords: Biodiversity;Bio-economy;Collaboration;Ecosystem services;Environmental history;Gap analysis;Governance;Green infrastructure;Habitat modelling;Intensification;Landscape approach;Planning;Stakeholder mapping;Transdisciplinary;Rural development
Abstract: To support human well-being, green (or ecological) infrastructure policy stresses the need to sustain functional networks of representative terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems for the sustainable provision of multiple ecosystem services. Implementing this means that the complexity of interactions betveen social and ecological systems at multiple spatial scales and levels of governance needs to be understood. Place-based knowledge production and learning through integration of different research disciplines in collaboration with actors and stakeholders (i.e. transdisciplinary research) is a key feature to achieve this goal. Using a suite of local landscapes and regions on the European continent's West and East as a laboratory, we developed and applied a step-wise approach to produce knowledge and encourage learning towards functional green infrastructures. Our diagnoses of forest landscapes shovv that the functionality for wood production and biodiversity conservation was inversely related in the gradient from long to short forest management histories. In Europe's West there is a need for increased quantity of, and more functional, protected areas; diversification of management methods; and landscape restoration. In NW Russia there are opportunities to intensify forest management, and to continue the land-sparing approach with zoning for different functions, thus reducing biodiversity loss. Examples of diagnoses of sočiai systems included the evaluation of comprehensive planning in Svveden, outcomes for biodiversity conservation of forest certification in Lithuania, and learning from environmental managers. We conclude that the main challenge for securing functional green infrastructure is poor cross-sectoral integration. Treatment of social-ecological systems requires knowledge-based collaboration and learning
Internet: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/f43/9_31.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/61576
https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2019.1.9
Affiliation(s): Miškų ir ekologijos fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Žemės ūkio akademija
Appears in Collections:1. Straipsniai / Articles
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml12.61 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

23848.pdf1.3 MBAdobe PDF   Restricted AccessView/Open
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 5

1
checked on Apr 3, 2021

Page view(s)

53
checked on Mar 30, 2021

Download(s)

9
checked on Mar 31, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.