Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/58250
Type of publication: Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus (S1);Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or / and Scopus (S1)
Field of Science: Philology (H004);Filologija (H004)
Author(s): Łuniewska, Magdalena;Ünal-Logacev, Özlem;Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria;Slančová, Daniela;Blom, Elma;Boerma, Tessel;Chiat, Shula;Abreu, Pascale Engel de;Gagarina, Natalia;Gavarro, Anna;Håkansson, Gisela;Hickey, Tina;Jensen de Lopez, Kristine;Theodoros Marinis;Popović, Maša;Thordardottir, Elin;Blažienė, Agnė;Savić, Maja;Roch, Maja;Rinker, Tanja;Ringblom, Natalia;Pomiechowska, Barbara;Haman, Ewa;Polišenská, Kamila;O’Toole, Ciara;Fhlannchadha, Siobhán Nic;Nenonen, Olga;Levorato, Chiara;Kunnari, Sari;Kronqvist, Bjarke;Kapalková, Svetlana;Kambanaros, Maria;Janssen, Bibi;Gatt, Daniela;Fritsch, Nelly-Ann;Ehret, Inger-Anne;Ege, Pınar;Dabašinskienė, Ineta;Cantú Sánchez, Myriam;Anđelković, Darinka;Southwood, Frenette;Etenkowski, Bartłomiej;Armon-Lotem, Sharon
Title: Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: is there a cross-linguistic order of words?
Is part of: Behavior research methods. New York : Springer, 2016, Vol. 48, iss. 3
Extent: p. 1154-1177
Date: 2016
Note: ISSN: 1554-3528 (electronic version). WOS:000382653900026
Keywords: Kalbos įsisavinimas;Age of acquisition;Lingvistinis sugretinimas;Subjective ratings;Cross-linguistic comparison
Abstract: We present a new set of subjective age-ofacquisition (AoA) ratings for 299 words (158 nouns, 141 verbs) in 25 languages from five language families (AfroAsiatic: Semitic languages; Altaic: one Turkic language: Indo-European: Baltic, Celtic, Germanic, Hellenic, Slavic, and Romance languages; Niger-Congo: one Bantu language; Uralic: Finnic and Ugric languages). Adult native speakers reported the age at which they had learned each word. We present a comparison of the AoA ratings across all languages by contrasting them in pairs. This comparison shows a consistency in the orders of ratings across the 25 languages. The data were then analyzed (1) to ascertain how the demographic characteristics of the participants influenced AoA estimations and (2) to assess differences caused by the exact form of the target question (when did you learn vs. when do children learn this word); (3) to compare the ratings obtained in our study to those of previous studies; and (4) to assess the validity of our study by comparison with quasi-objective AoA norms derived from the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI). All 299 words were judged as being acquired early (mostly before the age of 6 years). AoA ratings were associated with the raters’ social or language status, but not with the raters’ age or education. Parents reported words as being learned earlier, and bilinguals reported learning them later. Estimations of the age at which children learn the words revealed significantly lower ratings of AoA. Finally, comparisons with previous AoA and MB-CDI norms support the validity of the present estimations. Our AoA ratings are available for research or other purposes
Internet: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6
https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6
Affiliation(s): Humanitarinių mokslų fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Lituanistikos katedra
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml22.02 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

126
checked on Aug 16, 2019

Download(s)

4
checked on Aug 16, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.