Models of congruence of personal and organizational values: how many points of contact are there between science and practice?
Author | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Lietuvos sporto universitetas | LT | |
LT |
Date | Volume | Start Page | End Page |
---|---|---|---|
2017 | 145 | 111 | 131 |
URI | Access Rights |
---|---|
Straipsnis SpringerLink | Viso teksto dokumentas (prieiga prenumeratoriams) / Full Text Document (Access for Subscribers) |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/58128 |
The paper aims to analyse the structure of the formed models of congruence of personal and organizational values, opportunities of their application in order to conceptualize the guidelines for the formation of an integrated model. The models for analysis were selected from the articles published in international databases with the keywords associated with value congruence models and grouped by the types of models: models that represent the origin of the phenomenon of value congruence and methodology of evaluation, and models, which depict the impact of value congruence on the employee and activities of the organization. The main result of this research is a complex analysis of all models of congruence of personal and organizational values presented in the scientific literature, in the aspect of their structure, content and practical application. It was found that the essential elements of the models analysed are personal values, organizational values, congruence of personal and organizational values and the influence of congruence on the person and the organization. However, the models lack not only the scientific substantiation of the influence of the phenomenon of value congruence on the person and the organization, but also practical recommendations on how to achieve strong value congruence in the organization. This article exclusively presents the analysis of models developed by different scientists, but the obtained results of empirical studies are not compared statistically, applying certain models in practice. Such criteria as the sample size, the nature of activities of the organizations were not analysed and the states, in which the studies were carried out with the application of the analysed models, are not emphasized. This study also does not aim to determine the most appropriate diagnostic instrument for evaluation of value congruence, leaving the open way for the further discussions. [...]
Journal | IF | AIF | AIF (min) | AIF (max) | Cat | AV | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS | 2.917 | 2.103 | 1.505 | 2.702 | 2 | 1.312 | 2017 | Q1 |
Journal | IF | AIF | AIF (min) | AIF (max) | Cat | AV | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS | 2.917 | 2.103 | 2.103 | 2.702 | 2 | 1.312 | 2017 | Q1 |
Journal | Cite Score | SNIP | SJR | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal of Business Ethics | 4.9 | 1.798 | 1.276 | 2017 | Q1 |