Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/56673
Type of publication: Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or / and Scopus (S1)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Sirbikytė, Gintarė;Čerka, Paulius;Grigienė, Jurgita
Title: Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence
Is part of: Computer law and security review. London : Elsevier Ltd, 2015, Vol. 31, iss. 3
Extent: p. 376-389
Date: 2015
Keywords: Dirbtinis intelektas;Dirbtinio intelekto rizikos;Dirbtinis intelektas kaip įrankis;Atsakomybė už žalą;Teisinis reguliavimas;Netiesioginė atsakomybė;Griežtoji atsakomybė;Artificial intelligence;Liability for damages;Legal regulation;Risks by AI;Vicarious liability;Strict liability
Abstract: The emerging discipline of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has changed attitudes towards the intellect, which was long considered to be a feature exclusively belonging to biological beings, i.e. homo sapiens. In 1956, when the concept of Artificial Intelligence emerged, discussions began about whether the intellect may be more than an inherent feature of a biological being, i.e. whether it can be artificially created. AI can be defined on the basis of the factor of a thinking human being and in terms of a rational behavior: (i) systems that think and act like a human being; (ii) systems that think and act rationally. These factors demonstrate that AI is different from conventional computer algorithms. These are systems that are able to train themselves (store their personal experience). This unique feature enables AI to act differently in the same situations, depending on the actions previously performed. The ability to accumulate experience and learn from it, as well as the ability to act independently and make individual decisions, creates preconditions for damage. Factors leading to the occurrence of damage identified in the article confirm that the operation of AI is based on the pursuit of goals. This means that with its actions AI may cause damage for one reason or another; and thus issues of compensation will have to be addressed in accordance with the existing legal provisions. The main issue is that neither national nor international law recognizes AI as a subject of law, which means that AI cannot be held personally liable for the damage it causes. In view of the foregoing, a question naturally arises: who is responsible for the damage caused by the actions of Artificial Intelligence? In the absence of direct legal regulation of AI, we can apply article 12 of United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, which states that a person.[...]
Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.03.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.03.008
Affiliation(s): Advokatų kontora Čerka ir partneriai
Privatinės teisės katedra
Teisės fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml11.71 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

186
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Download(s)

26
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.