Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/52519
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGruodytė, Edita-
dc.contributor.authorMilčiuvienė, Saulė-
dc.coverage.spatialLT-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-06T23:29:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-06T23:29:16Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn2029431X-
dc.identifier.otherVDU02-000019509-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.slk.lt/sites/default/files/studijos_siuolaikineje_visuomeneje_2016_0.pdf-
dc.description.abstractRemiantis teisėjų tarybos nutarimu, Lietuvoje nuo 2006 metų lapkričio 24 dienos teismų procesiniai dokumentai (sprendimai, nuosprendžiai, nutarimai ir nutartys) juos skelbiant internete, turi būti nuasmeninti. Įsigaliojus šiai tvarkai iš esmės susiduria du vienas kitam prieštaraujantys interesai: visuomenės teisė laisvai gauti ir skleisti informaciją bei asmens teisė į privatumą. Šiame straipsnyje, įvertinus tarptautinius ir supranacionalinius dokumentus, kitų valstybių ir tarptautinių teismų (ESTT ir EŽTT) procesinių dokumentų skelbimo internete praktiką, bus įvertinta Lietuvoje egzistuojanti praktika ir jos atitiktis visuomenės informavimo principui. Straipsnyje apsiribojama teismo procesinių dokumentų baudžiamosiose bylose nuasmeninimo tikslingumo analizelt
dc.description.abstractAccording to the Resolution of the Judicial Council the published judicial decisions in Lithuania should be anonymised. This requirement creates the conflict of two interests: public's right freely receive and disseminate information and the individual's right to privacy. The aim of the article is to analyse existing regulation on publishing judicial decisions (in criminal cases) in Lithuania and to evaluate its compliance with the freedom to receive information. The article reviews the international and supranational legal documents, decisions of the Court of Justice of European Union and the European Court of Human Rights and scientific literature. The analysis leads to the conclusions that the interest of privacy dominates over the freedom of expression when the judicial decisions are published. Freedom of expression and the right to privacy are two equivalent rights, however they are not unconditional and international and national legal documents set conditions, when they can be restricted. These rights can be restricted only by law. The restriction should be interpreted narrowly according to the principle of proportionality and should be essential for the democratic society. The authors come to the conclusion that the automatic anonymization of all judicial decisions violates the public interest to know and freedom of expression is unjustifiably restricted. The authors recommend changing the order of the publication of judicial decisions. First, decisions against public person should not be anonymised, because the right to know about public persons is widely recognized. Secondly, it is also proposed to consider the possibility not to anonymise judicial documents, when serious or very serious crimes and/or violent crimes are committed, because in these cases the public interest to know the person, who committed a crime, outweighs the individual's right to privacy. [...]en
dc.description.sponsorshipPrivatinės teisės katedra-
dc.description.sponsorshipViešosios teisės katedra-
dc.description.sponsorshipVytauto Didžiojo universitetas-
dc.format.extentp. 184-196-
dc.language.isolt-
dc.relation.ispartofStudijos šiuolaikinėje visuomenėje : mokslo darbai = Studies in modern society : academic papers. Šiauliai : Šiaurės Lietuvos kolegija, 2016, nr. 7 (1)-
dc.relation.isreferencedbyIndexCopernicus-
dc.relation.isreferencedbyEducation Research Complete (EBSCO)-
dc.subjectTeismo procesiniai sprendimailt
dc.subjectAsmens duomenų apsaugalt
dc.subjectSaviraiškos laisvėlt
dc.subjectJudicial decisionsen
dc.subjectProtection of personal dataen
dc.subjectFreedom of expressionen
dc.subject.classificationStraipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)-
dc.subject.otherTeisė / Law (S001)-
dc.titleAr Lietuvoje taikomas teismų procesinių sprendimų nuasmeninimas nepažeidžia visuomenės informavimo principo?lt
dc.title.alternativeDoes anonymization of judicial decisions in Lithuania comply with the principle of freedom to receive information?en
dc.typeresearch article-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation39-
dc.date.updated2016-08-19T14:36Z-
local.object{"source": {"code": "vdu", "handle": "19509"}, "publisher": {"other": ["Šiaurės Lietuvos kolegija"], "list": false}, "db": {"clarivate": false, "scopus": false, "list": true}, "issn": ["2029-431X"], "code": "S4", "subject": ["S001"], "url": ["http://www.slk.lt/sites/default/files/studijos_siuolaikineje_visuomeneje_2016_0.pdf"], "country": "LT", "language": "lt", "area": "S", "original": true, "pages": 13, "sheets": 0.929, "timestamp": "20160819143632.0", "account": {"year": 2016, "late": false}, "na": 2, "nip": 0, "affiliation": [{"contribution": 0.5, "aip": 1, "country": ["LT"], "rel": "aut", "org": [{"create": true, "contribution": 0.5, "name": "Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas", "id": "111950396", "level": "0", "type": "uni", "research": "1", "status": "1", "unit": {"name": "Teisės fakultetas", "id": "11", "level": "1", "type": "fak", "research": "1", "status": "1", "unit": {"name": "Viešosios teisės katedra", "id": "1101", "level": "2", "type": "kat", "research": "1", "status": "1"}}}], "id": "15E473D4E4166160C8CDFC40DC2E8727", "lname": "Gruodytė", "fname": "Edita", "status": "1", "orcid": "0000-0003-1105-9860", "name": "Gruodytė, Edita"}, {"contribution": 0.5, "aip": 1, "country": ["LT"], "rel": "aut", "org": [{"create": true, "contribution": 0.5, "name": "Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas", "id": "111950396", "level": "0", "type": "uni", "research": "1", "status": "1", "unit": {"name": "Teisės fakultetas", "id": "11", "level": "1", "type": "fak", "research": "1", "status": "1", "unit": {"name": "Privatinės teisės katedra", "id": "1102", "level": "2", "type": "kat", "research": "1", "status": "0"}}}], "id": "C60A08E7D7F2C07F16BE148FC2C3E549", "lname": "Milčiuvienė", "fname": "Saulė", "status": "1", "orcid": "0000-0002-8253-9522", "name": "Milčiuvienė, Saulė"}]}-
local.typeS-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptTeisės fakultetas-
crisitem.author.deptPrivatinės teisės katedra-
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications
Files in This Item:
marc.xml9.8 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show simple item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

139
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

12
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.