Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/49077
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Suchorukovaitė, Berta
Title: Should the attorney-client privilege be applicable to patent agents?
Is part of: International Journal of Baltic Law [Elektroninis išteklius]. Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, Florida Coastal School of Law., Vol. 3, iss. 1 (2007)
Extent: p. 40-58
Date: 2007
Keywords: Patent;Patent agent;Attorney-client privilege
Abstract: This article analyzes the importance of intellectual property and the necessity to protect inventors’ rights to the information, which they reveal to their representatives - patent agents. An essential element of the communications between legal adviser and his/her client (inventor) is the privilege protecting these communications from disclosure. Firstly, the author provides general information about patent system, attorney-client privilege, their origins and development. For the purposes of this analysis article pays much attention towards the definitions of „attorney“, „client“ and „patent law“. The applicability of attorney-client privilege depends on the theory, which is used, and the country, in which it is used. For example, one of the theories says that a patent agent is a conduit between inventor and patent office. The conduit theory relies on a presumption that a legal adviser is just a conduit – he/she receives information from the client and transmits it to the third parties. In circumstances where no confidentiality, objective and subjective expectations exist, the attorney-client privilege cannot be applied. However, some courts in the United States did not rely on conduit theory, but denied attorney-client privilege to patent agents. This opinion can be based on an argument that patent agent cannot render legal services because he/she does not have legal education. There are other reasons why patent agent should not be granted attorney-client protection, such as that patent agent is not the member of the bar. However, in last three decades courts were willing to grant attorney-client privilege to the patent agents.[...]
Internet: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/49077
Affiliation(s): Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml8.44 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

120
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Download(s)

10
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.