Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/48559
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Politikos mokslai / Political sciences (S002)
Author(s): Švarplys, Andrius
Title: What the membership has taught? : National identity construction in Lithuanian public discourse after accession to the European Union
Is part of: Romanian journal for Baltic and Nordic studies = Revista Româna de Studii Baltice si Nordice. Târgoviste : Asociatia Romana pentru Studii Baltice si Nordice, Vol. 4, no. 2, 2012
Extent: p. 151-173
Date: 2012
Note: E-ISSN 2067-225X
Keywords: National collective identity;Public discourse;Russia;Lithuania;Integrational identity;Central Eastern Europe;Civilizational identity;European Union
Abstract: ‘Europe’ and ‘Russia’ have historically been the most remarkable landmarks, playing geopolitical, cultural, and moral guide-role in the construction of national collective identities in the Central Eastern European countries, including Lithuania. This ‘civilizational identity’ helped to unite Lithuanian political elites as well as society towards the direction to West and Europe after the collapse of Soviet Union. The question article addresses is: does the factual belonging to the European Union after the 1st May, 2004 give the impulse to re-define ‘Europe’ and ‘Russia’ as the old essentials of collective identity of Lithuanians? The article presents the research based on monitoring of national public discourse (five Lithuanian national newspapers) in 2004-2007, i.e. enjoying three years of membership in the European Union and NATO.The main result is that the role of Russia in the Lithuanian collective identity has not changed and still continues to play the major threat. The membership in the European Union and NATO has not solved Lithuanian security problem. According to the perceived threat, Russia has started to penetrate softly into Lithuania’s economy (especially energy sector) and has silently begun to make an impact to the domestic political parties and political elite. The traditional role of Europe, however, is slowly but gradually shifting from mythical ‘Paradise’ image to more critical understandings about divided Europe and selfish member-states. Already being in the EU and NATO, Lithuania should balance sometimes unfriendly westerners’ reluctance to understand the situation and help against Russia with the economic power that Russia uses as a political instrument against Lithuania on the international arena, as well as in domestic politics. This results in the feelings of „lost and forgotten” between Europe and Russia.[...]
Internet: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/48559
Affiliation(s): Politikos mokslų ir diplomatijos fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml8.08 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

146
checked on Mar 29, 2020

Download(s)

14
checked on Mar 29, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.