Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type of publication: Straipsnis recenzuojamoje Lietuvos tarptautinės konferencijos medžiagoje / Article in peer-reviewed Lithuanian international conference proceedings (P1e)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Berkmanas, Tomas
Title: On the judicial activism in the constitutional jurisprudence of the United States of America and Lithuania : lessons to learn
Other Title: Teisminis aktyvizmas Jungtinių Amerikos Valstijų ir Lietuvos konstitucinėje jurisprudencijoje: pamokos ateičiai
Is part of: Globalizacijos įtaka teisei: nauji iššūkiai ir naujos galimybės = Impact of globalization to law : new challenges and new opportunities [Elektroninis išteklius] : Tarptautinės mokslinės konferencijos medžiaga, 2009 m. gegužės mėn. 22 d. Vytauto Didžiojo universitete (Lietuva). Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2009
Extent: p. 76-81
Date: 2009
Keywords: Teisminis aktyvizmas;JAV konstitucinė jurisprudencija;Lietuvos konstitucinė jurisprudencija;Judicial activism;Constitutional jurisprudence of USA;Constitutional jurisprudence of Lithuania
ISBN: 9789955125280
Abstract: Today perhaps nobody doubts that not only American, but also Lithuanian constitutional jurisprudence has undergone the period of judicial activism. As a deeper analysis of judicial activism, itself being a rather vague conception, is beyond the limits of this presentation, therein we will only try to react to two very general statements in favor of judicial activism in the constitutional jurisprudence of Lithuania. The first general statement is related to Justice John Marshall. In Lithuania, Justice John Marshall could be and is usually presented as a founder of the constitutional review – with the consequence of the invalidation of law, if it contradicts Constitution – as an immanent part of the powers of the court institutionally involved in constitutional adjudication (hereinafter – constitutional court). Favoritism of judicial activism in the constitutional jurisprudence is, among other things, based on the authority and ideas of Justice John Marshall. Nevertheless, such basis reveals only “one side of the coin”, as Justice John Marshall – his activity and ideas – are criticized in the United States; thus, some aspects of the “other side of the coin”, especially as generally relevant, should be revealed.[...]
Affiliation(s): Teisės fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml6.73 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats

Page view(s)

checked on Mar 29, 2020


checked on Mar 29, 2020

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.