Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/44132
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFomin, Vladislav V-
dc.contributor.authorde Vries, Henk J-
dc.coverage.spatialJP-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-06T20:38:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-06T20:38:28Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.isbn9784885522406-
dc.identifier.otherVDU02-000007355-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/44132-
dc.description.sponsorshipInformatikos fakultetas-
dc.description.sponsorshipTaikomosios informatikos katedra-
dc.description.sponsorshipVytauto Didžiojo universitetas-
dc.format.extentp. 99-112-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.relation.ispartofSIIT2009 : 6th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, September 8-10, 2009 Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo : IEICE Communication Society-
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)-
dc.relation.isreferencedbyIEEE Xplore-
dc.subjectExisting research emphasizes the far-reaching effects of formal international standardization and recognizes the importance of involving the key stakeholders in the process of developing standards. However, to date no systematic assessment has been made on how well competing interests of different stakeholders are balanced in standards development. In this work we fill the gap in the literature by reporting on actual causes and effects of stakeholdersí under-representation in standardization process. We derive the findings from four case studies of standards development. Our findings confirm the earlier literature in that there is a clear causal effect between stakeholders under-representation and problems in terms of quality of standardization outputs. New contributions to extant literature are made, and managerial implications for remedying unbalanced stakeholder representation are drawnen
dc.subjectStakeholderen
dc.subjectInterestsen
dc.subjectRepresentationen
dc.subjectAnalysisen
dc.subjectCase studyen
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.subjectStandardizationen
dc.subject.otherInformatika / Informatics (N009)-
dc.titleHow Balanced Is Balanced Enough? Case Studies of Stakeholders’ (Under-) Representation in Standardization Processen
dc.typeStraipsnis konferencijos medžiagoje Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or Scopus DB conference proceedings (P1a)-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation58-
dc.date.updated2009-11-18T15:03Z-
local.object{"source": {"code": "vdu", "handle": "62076"}, "publisher": {"other": ["IEICE Communication Society"], "list": false}, "db": {"clarivate": false, "scopus": false, "list": true}, "isbn": ["9784885522406"], "code": "P1a", "subject": ["N009"], "country": "JP", "language": "en", "area": "N", "original": true, "pages": 14, "sheets": 1, "timestamp": "20091118150340.0", "account": {"year": 2009, "late": false}, "na": 2, "nip": 0, "affiliation": [{"contribution": 0.5, "aip": 1, "rel": "aut", "org": [{"create": true, "contribution": 0.5, "name": "Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas", "id": "111950396", "level": "0", "type": "uni", "research": "1", "status": "1", "unit": {"name": "Informatikos fakultetas", "id": "04", "level": "2", "type": "fak", "research": "1", "status": "0", "unit": {"name": "Taikomosios informatikos katedra", "id": "0401", "level": "3", "type": "kat", "research": "1", "status": "0"}}}], "id": "641138D5036EEB8CF60972395B2B21EB", "lname": "Fomins", "fname": "Vladislavs", "status": "1", "orcid": "0000-0001-8423-2500", "name": "Fomin, Vladislav V"}, {"contribution": 0.5, "aip": 1, "rel": "aut", "lname": "de Vries", "fname": "Henk J", "status": "0", "name": "de Vries, Henk J"}]}-
local.typeP-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptTaikomosios informatikos katedra-
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications
Files in This Item:
marc.xml7.45 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show simple item record

Page view(s)

130
checked on Jan 6, 2020

Download(s)

10
checked on Jan 6, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.