Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/41146
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Vadyba / Management (S003)
Author(s): Čiegis, Remigijus;Kozlovskij, Viktor
Title: Darnaus ekonominio vystymosi vertinimo sistemų įvertinimas
Other Title: Assessment of sustainable economic development evualation systems
Is part of: Vadybos mokslas ir studijos - kaimo verslų ir jų infrastruktūros plėtrai = Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development: mokslo darbai. Kauno raj. : Akademija, 2011, Vol. 5(29)
Extent: p. 53-63
Date: 2011
Keywords: Ekonomika;Darnus vystymasis;Vertinimas;Rodikliai;Indeksai;Economy;Sustainable development;Assessment;Indicators
Abstract: Pastaruoju laikotarpiu veiksmingai darnaus vystymosi rodiklių sistemai sukurti ypač daug dėmesio skiria ne tik darnaus vystymosi teoretikai, bet ir įvairios valstybinės bei tarptautinės institucijos, atsakingos už praktinį darnaus vystymosi idėjų įgyvendinimą. Nors atrodytų, kad pati darnaus vystymosi koncepcijos esmė yra pakankamai aiški, bet tikslus apibrėžimas yra labai problemiškas ir sukelia didelių diskusijų, nes darnųjį vystymąsi sunku apibrėžti vienareikšmiai. Kita vertus, praktiškai visi autoriai sutaria dėl kelių esminių bendrų dalykų, į kuriuos būtina atkreipti dėmesį kuriant ar analizuojant darnaus vystymosi vertinimo rodiklius ir jų sistemas. Remiantis sukaupta teorine ir praktine medžiaga, įvertinant ekonomikos teorijos ir darnaus vystymosi principus, straipsnyje analizuojamos darnaus vystimosi vertinimo sistemos. Darbe naudojami loginės abstrakcijos ir kiekybiniai tyrimo metodai. Straipsnyje parengta analizė pakankamai gerai parodė, kad esamos darnaus vystymosi vertinimo sistemos nėra pakankamai gerai atskleidžiančios darnaus vystymosi vertinimą
Main object of this research is systems of assessment of sustainable development. Main goal is to analyze main systems of assessment of sustainable development. In trying to achieve main goal main task should be resolved – to analyze most important systems of assessment of sustainable development by selected criteria. Even though the essence of the concept of sustainable development is pretty much clear, the exact definition of sustainable development appeared to be very problematic and caused a lot of discussions, which are discussed in the paper in detail. However, due to the lack of a single definition encompassing all aspects of the studied concept and the lack of one perfect conception of the concept, we might tend to think, that the most accurate definition of sustainable development is the one provided by the UN World Commission on Environment and Development (or the Brundtland Commission) in a report entitled “Our Common Future”. According to this definition it is possible to distinguish this main sections of sustainable development analysis: a) three components: economic, social and ecological; b) sustainability; c) dynamism. The next part of paper offers an analysis of the content and problems of sustainable development models one faces while using them for a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of sustainability. Analysis done in the paper quit well show, that systems of sustainable development assessment, which are used in practice, are not sufficient for evaluation of sustainable development
Internet: http://www.asu.lt/vadyb/lt/42269
http://www.asu.lt/vadyb/lt/42269
Affiliation(s): Ekonomikos ir vadybos fakultetas
Ekonomikos katedra
Vilniaus kolegija
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml9.97 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

144
checked on Nov 1, 2019

Download(s)

10
checked on Nov 1, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.