Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/39132
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science (S1)
Field of Science: Biologija / Biology (N010)
Author(s): Kaya, Murat;Baublys, Vykintas;Can, Esra;Šatkauskienė, Ingrida;Bitim, Betül;Tubelytė, Vaida;Baran, Talat
Title: Comparison of physicochemical properties of chitins isolated from an insect (Melolontha melolontha) and a crustacean species (Oniscus asellus)
Is part of: Zoomorphology. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag, 2014, vol. 133, iss. 3
Extent: p. 285-293
Date: 2014
Note: eISSN 1432-234X
Keywords: Chitin;Insect;Melolontha melolontha;Thermal properties
Abstract: The chitin structures of two common European species belonging to Insecta (Melolontha melolontha) and Crustacea (Oniscus asellus) were isolated. The same procedure is followed for chitin isolations for both the species. First, HCl was used for removing of minerals in the organisms, and then, the protein structure was removed by using NaOH. Chitins obtained from these two species were characterized physicochemically. Physicochemical properties of chitins isolated from the insect and the crustacean were compared to each other. The chitin content for dry weights of M. melolontha and O. asellus were recorded as 13–14 and 6–7 %, respectively. The results of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis were found to be more or less similar. The surface morphologies of chitins were examined via environmental scanning electron microscopy and nanofibers, and pore structures were observed. While the chitin nanofibers of O. asellus were adherent to each other, nanofibers of M. melolontha were non-adherent. On the other hand, the number of pores was much higher in the chitin from M. melolontha than in the chitin from O. asellus. Looking at the elemental analysis results, the M. melolontha chitin was found to be more pure than the O. asellus chitin. For this reason, M. melolontha has been considered more attractive source for chitin than O. asellus
Internet: http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/17/art%253A10.1007%252Fs00435-014-0227-6.pdf?auth66=1402136268_c354a7042179a7ca6b0aa7fc1b7ed982&ext=.pdf
Affiliation(s): Biologijos katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml13.09 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 1

38
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Page view(s)

105
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

8
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.