Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/38138
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Spaičienė, Jurgita
Title: Nemokaus skolininko turto administravimas Lietuvos Respublikoje (1918–1940 m.)
Other Title: Property administration of the insolvent debtor in Lithuania in 1918–1940
Is part of: Jurisprudencija : mokslo darbai. Vilnius : Mykolo Romerio universiteto Leidybos centras, 2007, nr. 4(94)
Extent: p. 61-66
Date: 2007
Keywords: Nemokus skolininkas;Administratoriai;Prisiekęs rūpintojas;Sindikas;Konkurso valdytojas;Insolvent debtor;Administrator;Receiver;Sworn guardian;Administrator of insolvent person
Abstract: Straipsnyje nagrinėjamas asmenų, skiriamų administruoti ir saugoti nemokaus skolininko turtą, teisinis statusas pagal 1918–1940 m. Lietuvos Respublikoje galiojusius teisės aktus. Šie asmenys, kurie šiuo metu galiojančiuose teisės aktuose įvardyti kaip bankroto administratoriai, remiantis tuomet Lietuvoje galiojusia teise buvo įvardyti prisiekusiais rūpintojais, kuratoriais, sindikais, konkurso valdytojais. Pagrindinis dėmesys skiriamas tokiems asmenims keliamiems kvalifikaciniams reikalavimams, jų skyrimo tvarkai, funkcijoms bei užmokesčio už atliekamą darbą skaičiavimo būdams(-ui)
The article contains three main parts: appointments, functions and fees of administrators of insolvent persons in 1918-1940 in Lithuania. The objective of this article is to analyze activities of administrators in the insolvency process. In this article any person who had at a responsibility of proper administration of property and assets of debtors is named as administrator or under ancient Rome civil law – curator bonorum; it involves receivers, sworn guardians, trustees, syndics and other positions used at that time in Lithuania. The article does not analyze in detail differences of these positions. It mainly focuses on their common aspects of their activities, functions and responsibilities. There were no special requirements for administrator’s candidature. Usually they were attorneys at law, treated by the court as honest and reliable persons. Lithuania inherited laws of insolvency regulation partially from Russia, Germany and France. This caused noticeable differences in legal regulation of insolvency process and activities in different regions of Lithuanian Republic during 1918-1940’s. Regardless the differences in regulations the main purpose of administrators was the same. They had to balance out interests of creditors and debtors using quite limited rights, e.g. administrators could not contest transactions of debtors without approval of creators. The main functions of administrators were the retention of assets of insolvent debtors, the recovery of assets from the other debtors, the assurance of protection for the assets of insolvent debtors and the accountancy of liabilities and debts. Worth to notice, that usually administrators could not proceed working up to the end of the insolvency procedure. Distribution of assets of the insolvent person and liquidation process was the competition board’s deal
Internet: https://www.mruni.eu/lt/mokslo_darbai/jurisprudencija/archyvas/?l=96545
https://www.mruni.eu/lt/mokslo_darbai/jurisprudencija/archyvas/?l=96545
Affiliation(s): Mykolo Romerio universitetas, tistk@mruni.lt
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml10.39 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

148
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Download(s)

10
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.