Visuomenės subkultūrizacija ir alternatyvaus pilietiškumo raida
| Date | Volume | Issue | Start Page | End Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 19 | 1 | 35 | 43 |
| URI | Access Rights |
|---|---|
| Straipsnis žurnalo svetainėje | Viso teksto dokumentas (atviroji prieiga) / Full Text Document (Open Access) |
| https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/37608 |
Straipsnyje kalbama apie viešosios politikos įtaką pilietiškumo raidai didėjant visuomenės diversifikacijai ir veikiant kūrybinėms industrijoms bei spektaklio visuomenei. Visuomenės įvairovė siejama su bendruomenių, subkultūrų, etninių ir religinių grupių raida, jų gebėjimais ir poreikiu atstovauti savo viešiesiems interesams. Šie alternatyvaus pilietiškumo poreikiai taip pat sietini su interkultūralizacijos, multikultūralizmo, tinklinės visuomenės raidos, glokalizacijos, individuacijos fenomenais. Daugeliui subkultūrų būdingi tam tikri pilietinio dalyvavimo ir rezistencijos bruožai.
The article is devoted to the problem of alternative citizenship in the sphere of policy on the basis of subcultural and community analysis. People without feeling of strong essence haven’t motivation for missionary actions and prefer creative construction of their identities and symbolical worlds. However, they also need to resist unification, routine, total ideologies and permanent national identities. They change their identities and need intercultural communication skills and attitudes, advocate public interests, debate them, compete with other subcultures. Modern Lithuanian philosophers as well as world philosophical movement prepare conditions for social, cultural legitimizing of the Other. First of all it is the ethnic, gender and subcultural Other. Legitimation of subcultural public interests and their needs could be interpreted not only in the horizon of cultural diversity, but also as a plurality of citizenship and policy. Different ideologies, parties, political and local communities, types of interests, NGO, imagined communities, subcultures develop various public demands, identity needs, a diversity of world feelings and interpretations. This means that modern society contributes to alternative civic activities, and modern public intellectuals prepare discourses on it. The Other’s civic expressions destroy the routine, the mainstream discourses.[...].