Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35951
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Suder, Seili;Siibak, Andra
Title: Employers as nightmare readers: an analysis of ethical and legal concerns regarding employer-employee practices on SNS
Is part of: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2017 vol. 10, iss. 2, p. 76-106
Date: 2017
Keywords: Data processing;Employers;Employees;Social media;Data protection principles
Abstract: The aim of this interdisciplinary paper is to study the social reality surrounding the data processing practices employers and employees engage in on social networking sites (SNS). Considering the lack of empirical studies, as well as the considerable uncertainty in the way personal data protection is implemented across the European Union (EU), the paper offers insights on the topic. Qualitative text analysis of semi-structured interviews with employers from the service sector (N=10) and the field of media and communication (N=15), as well as employers from organisations which had experienced various problems due to things their employees had posted on social media (N=14), and employees from the financial sector (N=15) were carried out to explore whether the data protection principles, which can be viewed as the most important guidelines for employers in the EU, are actually followed in their everyday SNS data processing practices. Even though the data protection principles emphasise the need for fair, purposeful, transparent, minimal and accurate processing of personal data, our interviews with employers and employees reveal that the actual SNS processing practices rarely live up to the standards. Our findings indicate that there is a growing mismatch between the social reality and legal requirements regarding data subjects.
Internet: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2017-0013
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35951
Appears in Collections:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 2017, vol. 10, iss. 2

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

44
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons