Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaminova, Nasiya
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-23T06:50:41Z
dc.date.available2018-03-23T06:50:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2029-0454
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2017-0015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35949-
dc.description.abstractThe ‘access to justice’ within the meaning of the Treaty of Lisbon and the pertinent CJEU jurisprudence is primarily seen as access to the EU judicial system, i.e. to the EU Member States’ national courts applying the EU Law or/and the CJEU. The concept of ‘access to justice’ is therefore developing such premises of the Van Gend en Loos judgment as direct effect, vigilance of the EU individual, and the symbiotic relationship between the CJEU and national courts via the preliminary reference procedure. This work aims to explore the development of two basic ideas of Van Gend en Loos, i.e. granting directly enforceable EU rights to individuals and authorizing national courts to protect those rights, in light of the ‘access to justice’ concept within the meaning of the Lisbon Treaty – considering their importance for the realization of EU individuals’ substantive rights and uncertainty surrounding this issue. The paper develops a critique of the theory of justice in EU Law, analyzing if and how the Van Gend en Loos premises influenced the role of individuals making an attempt to claim their EU rights and the role of the EU courts responsible for the enforcement of ‘access to justice’ in the European Union. The claim of this paper is that the new concept of ‘access to justice’ brought by the Lisbon Treaty may be seen as the further development of the Van Gend ‘federalizing effect’ for greater integration through law and an enhanced protection of the individual within the EU multilevel system of Human Rights protection.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBaltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2017 vol. 10, iss. 2, p. 133-153en_US
dc.rightsSutarties data 2018-01-30, nr. A1806, laisvai prieinamas internetelt_LT
dc.rightsLaisvai prieinamas internete (DE GRUYTER OPEN)lt_LT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectVan Gend en Loosen_US
dc.subjectAccess to justiceen_US
dc.subjectEU individualen_US
dc.subjectPreliminary reference procedureen_US
dc.subjectEuropean Convention on Human Rightsen_US
dc.subjectCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Unionen_US
dc.title‘Access to justice’ and the development of the Van Gend En Loos doctrine: the role of courts and of the individual in EU lawen_US
dc.typeStraipsnis / Article
dc.subject.udc34 Teisė / Law
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 2017, vol. 10, iss. 2
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

58
checked on Nov 5, 2019

Download(s)

44
checked on Nov 5, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons