Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35748
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira
Title: Aprisoner’s right to be released or placed on parole: a comment on Öcalan v Turkey (No. 2) (18 March 2014)
Is part of: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2016 vol. 9, iss. 1, p. 69-92
Date: 2016
Keywords: Parole;European Court of Human Rights;Prisoners;Comparative law;Release
Abstract: The European Convention on Human Rights does not provide for a prisoner’s right to parole and no international or regional human rights instrument provides for this right. However, recently, in the case of Öcalan v Turkey (No. 2), one of the judges of the European Court of Human Rights interpreted the European Convention on Human Rights as providing for a prisoner’s right to parole. This is the first time that a judge of this court, and to the author’s best knowledge, a judge of a regional or international court, has expressly held that a prisoner has the right to parole. The author assesses this holding in the light of the jurisprudence or practice on the right to parole from the Human Rights Committee, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. In order to put the discussion in context, the author also highlights jurisprudence emanating from the European Court of Human Rights relevant to the relationship between parole and other human rights. The author recommends that the time has come for the right to parole to be recognised in human rights instruments.
Internet: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2016-0004
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35748
Appears in Collections:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 2016, vol. 9, iss. 1

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

40
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons