Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/34357
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Milčiuvienė, Saulė
Title: Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo reforma
Other Title: The reform of the Court of Justice of the European Union
Is part of: Visuomenės saugumas ir viešoji tvarka : mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys [elektroninis išteklius] = Public security and public order : scientific articles. Kaunas : Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2016, T. 17
Extent: p. 134-142
Date: 2016
Note: ISSN 2335-2035 (Online)
Keywords: Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismas;Bendrasis teismas;Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo statutas;Court of Justice of the European Union;General Court;Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union
Abstract: Straipsnyje pateikiama trumpa Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo raida didžiausią dėmesį skiriant 2015 m. Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo statuto pakeitimams. Straipsnio tikslas – išanalizuoti Bendrojo Teismo reformą, atkleisti šios reformos priežastis, apžvelgti diskusijas vykusias ES institucijose sprendimų priėmimo procese, atskleisti Teisingumo Teismo ir Bendrojo Teismo pozicijas dėl vykdomos reformos. Straipsnyje keliamas klausimas ar Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo Statuto pakeitimas, kuriuo numatomas dviejų teisėjų nuo kiekvienos valstybės narės į Bendrąjį Teismą skirimas, labiausiai atitinka Bendrojo Teismo darbo efektyvumo didinimo poreikius
The article presents the short evolution of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The author focuses on the resent (2015) amendment of the Statute of the Court of Justice of European Union, which increased the number of the judges in the General Court. The article aims - to analyze the reform of the General Court, to reveal the reasons of the reform, to review the discussions held in the EU institutions during decision-making process, to disclose the Court of Justice and the General Court's position concerning the implementation of the reform. The article raises the question: whether the amendment of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which provides that every Member State should have two judges in the General Court, is the most consistent with the needs of the General Court. In the historical development of the EU the main reasons for reforming the Court of Justice always has been an increasing number of cases in these courts. For the reform the European Union Court of Justice of 2015 the European Union was preparing gradually. Already in the Lisbon Treaty the supranational EU institutions were empowered to make the amendments of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Already at the start of the reform of the General Court it was rejected to establish a specialized court giving priority to the increasing the number of judges of the General Court. It was argued that the appointment of additional judges of the General Court would be faster and more flexible process than the establishment of a specialized court. The creation of specialized colleges of the General Court would provide the key advantage of a specialized court. [...]
Internet: https://www.mruni.eu/kpf_dokumentai/fakultetas/Leidiniai/MRU%20VSVT%20(17)%202016-12-16%20110.pdf
https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/34357
https://www.mruni.eu/kpf_dokumentai/fakultetas/Leidiniai/MRU%20VSVT%20(17)%202016-12-16%20110.pdf
Affiliation(s): Privatinės teisės katedra
Teisės fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:1. Straipsniai / Articles
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml9.62 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

172
checked on Oct 14, 2019

Download(s)

72
checked on Oct 14, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.