Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/34351
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.contributor.authorBivainis, Andrius
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:36:25Z
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn2345-0223
dc.identifier.urihttps://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/34351
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/ijas-2015-0006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/34351-
dc.description.abstractThis article is based on reassessment of the contemporary results of counterinsurgency and nation-building in Afghanistan. Nation-building initiatives have been started in the country since the Bonn agreement in December 2001. This agreement brought into reality the current governing system of Afghanistan. Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan has been initiated in full mode since 2009 after a sound success on Iraqi frontier. However, each operational area is bringing its own specifics into play. The same was with Afghanistan. The newly established constitutional presidential republic has faced with inheritance of unresolved sensitive ethnical identity issues, confrontation between different groups for self-governing authority and security of essential resources. These preconditions have brought a diversified and even confrontational social environment into reality. Prolonged military operations in Afghanistan could show that diversified social environment and misevaluated cultural heritage has led to misleading assumptions that centralized presidential governing system could become an effective ruling model for post-Taliban country. One of the key notions of this article is that historical lessons taught by long years of colonialist rule in Afghanistan has not been learned and misevaluation of diversified and confrontational local entities has brought another historical lesson of Afghan tribal resistance. More than that, diversified and confrontational entities of Afghanistan have not been a favorable subject for possible social contract. The term social contract was introduced as explanatory method of national political behavior and systemic structure by Jean Jacques Rousseau in 18th century Europe. Afghan society has become the subject to this model of political philosophy only as counterinsurgency campaign gained full capabilities around 2009. Reassessment of long term nation building efforts in this article is based on evaluation of Afghan social contract’s progress.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of areas studies, 2015, vol. 10, iss. 2, p. 119-138lt_LT
dc.rightsLaisvai prieinamas internete (DE GRUYTER OPEN)lt_LT
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAfghanistanen_US
dc.subjectAfghan entitiesen_US
dc.subjectNation-buildingen_US
dc.subjectCounterinsurgencyen_US
dc.subjectSocial contracten_US
dc.subjectHamid Karzaien_US
dc.titleContemporary Afghanistan outlook: between counterinsurgency and search of the social contracten_US
dc.typeStraipsnis / Article
dc.subject.udc3 Socialiniai mokslai / Social sciences
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:International Journal of Area Studies 2015, vol. 10, iss. 2
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

24
checked on Dec 5, 2021

Download(s)

34
checked on Dec 5, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons