Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/34029
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Hall, J. Christopher
Title: A comparison and blending of the countercultural practice models: structural and narrative social work
Other Title: Kultūriškai priešingų praktikos modelių lyginimas ir susiliejimas: struktūrinis ir naratyvu grįstas socialinis darbas
Is part of: Socialinis darbas. Patirtis ir metodai, 2016, nr. 18(2), p. 11-28
Date: 2016
Keywords: Structural social work;Struktūrinis socialinis darbas;Narrative social work;Family therapy in social work practice;Naratyvu grįstas socialinis darbas;Šeimos terapija socialinio darbo praktikoje
Abstract: The structural and narrative models of social work practice are summarized and compared relative to the social worker’s role, the conceptualization of the problem, and the intervention techniques utilized. The two approaches are found to differ significantly in all areas and most specifically in problem conceptualization. This difference is indicative of Kuhn’s (1962) observation that different conceptual paradigms are both structured and limited by their theoretical framework. Though both models vary by conceptualization and application, both are determined to be significantly different from the dominant medical model paradigm of “helping” and thus considered countercultural. Finally, it is pointed out that the challenge to the dominant paradigm by these two models allows them to be blended together in social work practice.
Struktūrinis ir naratyvu grįstas socialinio darbo praktikos modeliai yra apibendrinami ir palyginami analizuojant socialinio darbuotojo vaidmenį, problemos apibrėžimą ir naudojamas intervencijas. Visais analizuotais aspektais nustatyti pastebimi skirtumai tarp šių dviejų modelių. Ypač skiriasi problemos konceptualizavimas. Šie skirtumai paaiškinami Kuno (1962) pastebėjimais, kad skirtingas konceptualias paradigmas struktūruoja, apriboja jų teorinis pagrindas. Nors abu modeliai skirtingai konceptualizuojami ir taikomi, jie pastebimai skiriasi nuo dominuojančio medicininio „pagalbos“ modelio ir yra svarstomi kaip kultūriškai priešingi arba neigiantys dominuojančią „pagalbos“ kultūrą. Taigi struktūrinio ir naratyvu grįsto socialinio darbo modeliai praktikoje susilieja, keldami iššūkių dominuojančiai socialinio darbo paradigmai.
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/34029
http://dx.doi.org/10.7220/2029-5820.18.2.1
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/34029
Appears in Collections:Socialinis darbas. Patirtis ir metodai / Social Work. Experience and Methods 2016, nr. 18 (2)

Files in This Item:
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

92
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

133
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.