Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33986
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Šulcienė, Lina
Title: Žmogaus laisvės samprata šv. Tomo Akviniečio veikale „Summa theologiae“ (II dalis)
Other Title: The conception of human freedom in St. Thomas Aquinas work “Summa theologiae” (II)
Is part of: Soter : religijos mokslo žurnalas, 2007, nr. 22(50), p. 41-60
Date: 2007
Keywords: Šv. Tomas Akvinietis;Summa theologiae;Žmogaus laisvė;Protas ir valia;Liberum arbitrium;Valios laisvė;St. Thomas Aquinas;Human freedom;Intellect and will;Freedom of the will
Abstract: Šiame straipsnyje toliau tyrinėjama šv. Tomo Akviniečio žmogaus laisvės samprata veikale Summa Theologiae. Straipsnyje analizuojama liberum arbitrium galia ir valia, kurios, pasak Tomo, reprezentuoja žmogaus laisvę. Sykiu mėginama persvarstyti, ar pamatuoti argumentai teoretikų, tvirtinančių, kad Tomo mąstyme įvyko pokytis žmogaus laisvės klausimu, lyginant ankstyvąjį-vidurinįjį ir vėlyvąjį kūrybos laikotarpius.
The article continues the analyses of St. Thomas Aquinas’ conception of human freedom in his most important work Summa theologiae. It consistently researches the Summa in the same way as in the first part of this article. Three Summa‘s parts are analyzed – Prima Secundae, Secunda Secundae and Tertia Pars. The article steps over chronological mark that is pointed out by theoreticians arguing the change of Thomas’ reasoning on the issue of human freedom (D.O.Lottin and B. Lonergan). According to them, namely Prima Secundae and another late text – the 6th question of De Malo – represent changed Thomas’ reasoning on the issue of human freedom in comparison with early-middle and late periods of his work. The purpose of the article is to analyze further the Aquinas‘ conception of human freedom, the nature and action of power of liberum arbitrium and free will as well as to find out whether the arguments of change theoreticians are grounded. According to them, the concept ‚liberum arbitrium‘ „disappears“ from its usual and even essential ontological discourse in Thomas‘ late texts, and while analyzing the interaction of reason and will in the free action he attributes greater importance to the will compared with the reason, and so he moves towards voluntarism. [...]
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/33986
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33986
Appears in Collections:SOTER: religijos mokslo žurnalas / SOTER: Journal of Religious Science 2007, nr. 22(50)

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Download(s)

44
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.