Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33934
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrupa, Jozef
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-07T14:38:18Z
dc.date.available2017-03-07T14:38:18Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn2335-8785
dc.identifier.urihttps://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/33934
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33934-
dc.description.abstractIt is not a rare phenomenon in present day theology that some opinions are presented as the teaching of faith. Sometimes they reach such dimensions that we can find them in many theological manuals with the exception of the main works such as the documents of the Magisterium. The cause of these phenomena is the fact that the secondary source of theological science, which is the mind, is given greater relevance than the primary sources, which are the Holy Bible, Tradition and Magisterium. Furthermore, these documents are not studied and unknown although they are decisive for the knowledge of the content of faith. In reference to the documents of the Second Vatican Council, the words of Pope Paul VI are apropos: “Absurd situations are maintained by the fact that they are fed by the carelessness of many post-Council interpretations.” Pope Benedict XVI, when still a Cardinal, said: “Today it is especially relevant to go back to the documents of the Council. It was not the intention of Pope John XXIII and Paul VI to put depositum fidei up for discussion. Depositum fidei was for both untouchable and not a matter of discussion“. The Council’s intention was not to modify faith but to introduce it in a new, more effective form. If the Popes and Council fathers came to the conclusion that they could open themselves with trust to everything new that was positive in the modern world, they did so only because they were aware of their identity and their faith.en_US
dc.language.isoplen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSoter : religijos mokslo žurnalas, 2007, nr. 23(51), p. 23-41lt_LT
dc.rightsSutarties data 2006-10-02, nr. LLTI-00001, laisvai prieinamas internetelt_LT
dc.subjectBodily deathen_US
dc.subjectOriginal sinen_US
dc.subjectTeaching of the office of the churchen_US
dc.subjectSecond Vatican Councilen_US
dc.subjectCatechism of the Catholic Churchen_US
dc.subjectKūno mirtislt_LT
dc.subjectGimtoji nuodėmėlt_LT
dc.subjectKatalikų Bažnyčios mokymaslt_LT
dc.subjectVatikano II susirinkimaslt_LT
dc.subjectKatalikų Bažnyčios katekizmaslt_LT
dc.titlePrzyczyna śmierci cielesnej według konstytucji Gaudium Et Spes i katechizmu kościoła katolickiegopl_PL
dc.title.alternativeThe cause of bodily death according to the constitution Gaudium Et Spes and catechism of the Catholic Churchen_US
dc.title.alternativeKūno mirties ištakos pagal konstituciją Gaudium Et Spes ir katalikų bažnyčios katekizmąlt_LT
dc.typeStraipsnis / Article
dc.subject.udc2 Religija / Religion
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:SOTER: religijos mokslo žurnalas / SOTER: Journal of Religious Science 2007, nr. 23(51)
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

18
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

15
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.