Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33571
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Filosofija / Philosophy (H001)
Author(s): Račkauskas, Audrius;Karoblis, Gediminas
Title: Įkvepianti kasdienybės galia
Other Title: The power of everydayness to inspire
Is part of: Soter : religijos mokslo žurnalas. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 35 (2010)
Extent: p. 47-58
Date: 2010
Keywords: Įkvėpimas;Estetinis patyrimas;Kasdienybė;Pasyvus subjektyvizmas;Kasdienybės riktas;Atvejų hermeneutika;Inspiration;Aesthetical experience;Everydayness;Passive subjectivity;Break of everydayness;Hermeneutics of events
Abstract: Straipsnyje plėtojama kasdienybėje išryškėjančių patirčių – įkvėpimo ir estetinio patyrimo – deskripcija ir interpretacija. Atskleidus šių patirčių epistemologinius motyvus, parodoma, kad įsigalėjusi pasyvaus subjektyvizmo nuostata, kuria pateisinamas kasdienės ir „aukštosios kultūros“ lygiavertiškumas, implikuoja fundamentalų patirties ir kasdienybės fenomenų nesupratimą
The article aims to interpret some daily phenomena (such as inspiration or aesthetic experience) and to show how everydayness becomes a full-fledged sphere of culture and an object of philosophical investigation. It is assumed that with the disappearance of the boundaries between lower and higher cultures, the meaning of a specific way of perception (understanding), which transforms everydayness into a purposeful sphere of culture, does not disappear, but, on the contrary, becomes even more significant. The ontological distinction between daily and higher culture, which had been dominating in the public discourse for a long time, has been transformed into epistemological distinction functioning in the private (intrasubjective) sphere. Therefore, culture is no longer considered to be a place of objective values but rather treated as a mode of an individual relationship with reality. The consideration of this conception starts by highlighting some methodical principles that enable to treat various daily phenomena (that are usually considered as having no cultural significance) as the objects of philosophical investigation. These phenomena are analyzed mostly in the light of the methodological assumptions of Merab Mamardashvili and Bruno Latour. These thinkers urge to regard daily events and experience not as meaningless cases of contingency but rather treat them as a fertile material for philosophical consideration. It is assumed that the daily accidents, though seemingly rather small and of little significance, can draw and focus our attention (such cases are called breaks), and reveal some fundamental structures of being.[...]
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/33571
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/33571/1/ISSN2335-8785_2010_N_35_63.PG_47-58.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33571
Affiliation(s): Filosofijos katedra
Humanitarinių mokslų fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:SOTER: religijos mokslo žurnalas / SOTER: Journal of Religious Science 2010, nr. 35(63)
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml13.05 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Download(s)

36
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.