Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33326
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teologija / Theology (H002)
Author(s): Grickevičius, Artūras
Title: Tridento Susirinkimo 18 kanono įgyvendinimo Lietuvoje pėdsakais
Other Title: Following the trace of the implementation of the 18th canon of the Council of Trent
Is part of: Soter : religijos mokslo žurnalas. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 40 (2011)
Extent: p. 33-54
Date: 2011
Keywords: Seminarija;Kanonas;Bursa;Seminary;Canon
Abstract: Straipsnyje nagrinėjama, kaip Lietuvoje buvo įgyvendinamas Tridento Susirinkimo 18 kanonas ir kaip dabar traktuojamos įgyvendinant šį kanoną atsiradusios įstaigos
The title indicates an important gap in the Lithuanian historiography – lack of understanding the essence of both the decision of establishing seminaries and the seminaries itself. Historians who were describing the past of Lithuania have never made any attempts to analyze the essence of the seminary as an institution in the 16th–18th centuries. Only one research work devoted to this issue can be mentioned – namely, the doctoral thesis by the author of this article on the Papal seminary in Vilnius. The thesis deals with the essence of one particular seminary, but the essence of other seminaries as institutions remains outside the scope of attention. The problem arises due to Lithuanian historiography of recent decades: the newest study of Vilnius university history, as well as the newest study of the history of Christianity in Lithuania, both show the tendency to treat the early seminaries (those founded in Lithuania at the end of the 16th century and at the beginning of the 17th century) as students’ residences and not as special institutions. This treatment discloses lack of understanding both of the very idea of the Council of Trent about the institution of seminaries and the essence of implementing it in Lithuania. To solve the problem, the following questions have been raised: 1) how did the Church Fathers imagine the seminaries to be founded and how was the idea formulated in the 18th canon of the Council of Trent? 2) What were the early seminaries like? 3) What did the contemporaries call the Lithuanian seminaries of the 16th–18th centuries? 4) What were the essential features of the Lithuanian seminaries in the 16th–18th centuries? 5) How are the Lithuanian seminaries of the 16th–18th centuries conceived and explained by Polish and Lithuanian historians? 6) How should the Lithuanian seminaries of the 16th–18th centuries be understood and what should they be called?. [...]
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/33326
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/33326/1/ISSN2335-8785_2011_N_40_68.PG_33-54.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33326
Affiliation(s): Katalikų teologijos fakultetas
Teologijos katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:SOTER: religijos mokslo žurnalas / SOTER: Journal of Religious Science 2011, nr. 40(68)
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml10.85 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Download(s)

36
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.