Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32928
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Menotyra / History and theory of arts (H003)
Author(s): Klivis, Edgaras
Title: Perrašomos vietos : topografija, identitetas ir politika šiuolaikiniame Lietuvos teatre
Other Title: Rewriting places: topography, identity and politics in contemporary Lithuanian theatre
Is part of: Meno istorija ir kritika = Art history & criticism. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 2008, [T.] 4 : Menas ir tapatumas
Extent: p. 171-184
Date: 2008
Keywords: Teatro vieta;Teatrinė erdvė;Teatro politika;Nacionalinis teatras;Transnacionalizmas;Tradicija;Identitetas;Place of performance;Space of performance;Politics of theatre;National theatre;Site-specific atr;Transnationalism;Ontology;Tradition;Identity;Capitalism
Abstract: The concept of “performance place”, rather than a more common “space” is used to point out the significance of the physical and social location, where the theatre building or performance environment is situated, within the framework of the city fabric or geography of the country. The place of performance is a reflection of the shifting ideological, political and moral role which the institution of theatre is identified with in the society. The critical understanding of the place is related to the politics of the theatre, resistance to the discourse of power, as expressed by the artist’s geopolitical imagination, and transgression of the social bounds. The aim of this article is to employ the concept of performance place to reflect upon the Lithuanian theatre – to see how the understanding of the place has been changing and what political projects or myths govern the choice of different locations. Two ideas of performance place are dominant in the Lithuanian theatre practices today. The first one is related to the conception of the national theatre institutions as a place which legitimates the artistic practices through the relationship with the local national community. The second locates performative practices in the fissures and margins of the first one – the official and national culture network. These are marginal places such as abandoned quarters of the city or post-industrial spaces which provoke anarchic and resistant attitude towards the tradition and power structures. However, both conceptions of place become problematic and ambivalent in the context of contemporary late capitalist system.[...]
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/32928/1/ISSN1822-4547_2008_N_4.PG_171-184.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32928
Affiliation(s): Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Art History & Criticism / Meno istorija ir kritika 2008, nr. 4
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

39
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

36
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.