Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32918
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorButkevičienė, Jolita-
dc.coverage.spatialLT-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-29T07:25:19Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-29T07:25:19Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.issn18224555-
dc.identifier.otherVDU02-000005434-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/32918/1/ISSN1822-4547_2008_N_4.PG_199-213.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32918-
dc.description.abstractThe historical development of architectural heritage preservation dates back to the 18th-19th centuries, when the ideas of romanticism permeated all the cultural areas. The formation of national identity and interest in romanticizing history caused people to contemplate over their past. The new attitude led to undertaking a series of tasks to ensure the preservation of the most significant architectural monuments. For example, the first works of anastylosis and reconstruction were carried out as well as the theory of analyzing the issues of how to preserve the cultural heritage was given a start. The first stage of development extending from the 19th to the mid-20th century, could be called the early period during which two different trends of heritage preservation emerged. Prevailing in a larger part of Europe, the early restoration theory and practice were orientated towards the romanticized restoring of architectural heritage objects. The most famous representative of this trend was a French architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc who brought evidence to building the concept of stylistic restoration by asserting that the genuine primary state of an object is not the one that is seen in practice but the one which was conceived for building. However, this approach to the architectural heritage was not only widely welcome but was also criticized. The movement against stylistic restoration emerged in England. It rested on an understanding that each object belongs to its specific historical and cultural context; therefore, it is impossible to recreate the signs of the past. The most famous theoretician of this movement was John Ruskin in whose opinion the only solution capable of preserving heritage was conservation. In the first part of the 20th century, when the idea of creative interpretation was rejected, it became possible to join the contrasting principles of restoration and conservation theories.[...]en
dc.description.sponsorshipVytauto Didžiojo universitetas-
dc.format.extentp. 199-213-
dc.language.isolt-
dc.relation.ispartofMeno istorija ir kritika = Art history & criticism. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 2008, [T.] 4 : Menas ir tapatumas-
dc.relation.isreferencedbyMLA International Bibliography-
dc.rightsSutarties data 2006-10-02, nr. LLTI-00001, laisvai prieinamas internetelt_LT
dc.subjectPaveldotvarkos teorijoslt
dc.subjectPaveldotvarkos teorijų raidalt
dc.subjectRomantinis restauravimaslt
dc.subjectStilistinis restauravimaslt
dc.subjectRekonstravimaslt
dc.subjectKonservavimaslt
dc.subjectKultūros paveldo autentiškumaslt
dc.subjectEugène‘as Emanuelis Viollet le Ducaslt
dc.subjectRuskinas, Johnaslt
dc.subjectBrandis, Cesarelt
dc.subjectSalvadoras Muñoz Viñaslt
dc.subjectAtėnų chartijalt
dc.subjectVenecijos chartijalt
dc.subjectDevelopment of conservation theoryen
dc.subjectScientific theory of conservationen
dc.subjectRomantic restorationen
dc.subjectStylistic restorationen
dc.subjectRestorationen
dc.subjectReconstructionen
dc.subjectConservationen
dc.subjectClassical theories of conservationen
dc.subjectAesthetic theory of conservationen
dc.subjectEugène Emmanuel Viollet-le-Ducen
dc.subjectRuskin, Johnen
dc.subjectBrandi, Cesareen
dc.subjectSalvador Muñoz Viñasen
dc.subjectAuthenticity of culture heritageen
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten
dc.subjectAthens charteren
dc.subjectVenice charteren
dc.subject.classificationStraipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)-
dc.subject.otherMenotyra / History and theory of arts (H003)-
dc.titleArchitektūros paveldotvarkos teorinės minties raidalt
dc.title.alternativeThe development of the theory of architectural heritage conservationen
dc.typeresearch article-
dcterms.bibliographicCitation0-
dc.date.updated2019-10-21T11:45Z-
local.object{"source": {"code": "vdu", "handle": "5434"}, "publisher": {"other": ["Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla"], "list": false}, "db": {"clarivate": false, "scopus": false, "list": true}, "issn": ["1822-4555"], "code": "S4", "subject": ["H003"], "url": ["https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/32918/1/ISSN1822-4547_2008_N_4.PG_199-213.pdf", "https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32918"], "country": "LT", "language": "lt", "area": "H", "original": true, "pages": 15, "sheets": 1.071, "timestamp": "20191021114533.0", "account": {"year": 2008, "late": false}, "na": 1, "nip": 0, "affiliation": [{"contribution": 1, "aip": 1, "rel": "aut", "org": [{"create": true, "contribution": 1, "name": "Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas", "id": "111950396", "level": "0", "type": "uni", "research": "1", "status": "1"}], "id": "769DFDD05F3C5A02518238E673321D75", "lname": "Butkevičienė", "fname": "Jolita", "status": "1", "orcid": "0000-0002-1457-1926", "name": "Butkevičienė, Jolita"}]}-
local.typeS-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptMenotyros katedra-
Appears in Collections:Art History & Criticism / Meno istorija ir kritika 2008, nr. 4
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

54
checked on Dec 5, 2021

Download(s)

33
checked on Dec 5, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.