Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32575
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Filosofija / Philosophy (H001)
Author(s): Mažeikis, Gintautas
Title: Propagandinė literatūra : nuo ideologinės mimenezės iki mitografijos: vėlyvojo stalinizmo laikotarpio lietuvių literatūra
Other Title: Literature of Propaganda. From Ideological Mimesis to Mythography: Lithuanian Literature in the Late Stalinist Period
Is part of: Darbai ir dienos. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 48 (2007)
Extent: p. 233-260
Date: 2007
Keywords: Propaganda;Literatūra;Stalinizmas;Propaganda;Literature;Stalinist period
Abstract: In this article relationships between totalitarian propaganda in Lithuanian literature are analyzed from functional and symbolic perspectives. The emphasis is on critical, mimetic, mythographical, model and falsification function of propoganda evident in the official Lithuanian soviet literature from 1940 to 1953. Two types of propoganda are singled out in the article, the ideological and the pragmatic. Since Soviet propoganda emphasized in particular the pragmatic purposes of systematic persuasion, ideological beliefs and routine public propoganda were more important to writers and propagandists than creative thinking about the tasks of literature or the need to engage in persuasion. Most writers of the totalitarian period simply imitated the more effective rhetorical models or patterns and disguises, competing among themselves in matters of loyalty to the regime in power. In the case of Stalinist propoganda, mimesis had not only persuasive but first of all ritualistic puposes, akin to games played in accordance with very strict rules. At the same time, Soviet propagandists and litterateurs had be careful to remember what type of propoganda campaign was being waged by the party's official institutions, first of all by the party leader himself (Stalin), also the Central commitee of the Communist party and the Party Congress. Thus mimetic propoganda required that one followthree kinds of rules: ideological, campaign-relatedand creative. By contrast, genuinely autonomous literature follows only its own mimetic tradicions and seeks to perform its own inherent tasks. The creative function of Soviet propoganda literature can be defined by two different processes, persuasive mythography and artist creativity.[...]
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/32575
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/32575/1/ISSN2335-8769_2007_N_48.PG_233-260.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32575
Affiliation(s): Šiaulių universitetas
Appears in Collections:Darbai ir dienos / Deeds and Days 2007, nr. 48
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml9.85 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

224
checked on Mar 31, 2020

Download(s)

200
checked on Mar 31, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.