Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/32494
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Gruodytė, Edita
Title: Atskiri Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo įtakos baudžiamajai justicijai aspektai
Is part of: Teisės apžvalga [elektroninis išteklius] = Law review. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2016, nr. 2(14)
Extent: p. 98-114
Date: 2016
Keywords: Baudžiamoji justicija;Konstitucinio teismo jurisprudencija;Teisiniai principai;Teisingumo principas;Criminal justice;Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court;Legal principles;Principle of justice
Abstract: Šio straipsnio tikslas – pabandyti ištirti, kiek ir kokiais aspektais Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijoje buvo nagrinėjami tiesiogiai su baudžiamąja teise (tik materialiąja) susiję klausimai, bei įvertinti tiek realią šio teismo įtaką atskleidžiant baudžiamosios teisės normų turinį, tų baudžiamųjų normų atitiktį Konstitucijai ir jos „dvasiai“, tiek konstitucinės jurisprudencijos poveikį įstatymo leidėjui
After the restoration of independence, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter – the Constitutional Court) has been operating for 22 years and has certain impact both to the legislator and the implementation of justice. The goal of the article is to analyse to what extent and in what aspects the Constitutional Court jurisprudence has dealt with Lithuanian criminal law (only the material one) issues. This aim is realised in two stages. The main function of the Constitutional Court is checking the constitutionality of legal acts which is discussed in the first section of the article through the analysis of the rulings of the Constitutional Court in which certain norms of the Criminal code were declared unconstitutional. The next, not less important, impact of the Constitutional Court to the criminal law is through the formation of the constitutional doctrine which is discussed in the second part of the article. It was concluded that during the analysed period only nine resolutions of the Constitutional Court were devoted to the questions of material criminal law, i.e. on the average, less than one resolution every two years, which in itself shows the relatively low direct impact of the Constitutional Court. During the researched period, one third of the cases, i.e., three rulings concerning certain norms of Penal Code (provision of death penalty for intentional murder with aggravating circumstances; inflexibility of the Criminal Code- lack of judicial discretion in provision of the kind and the extent of criminal penalties; the possibility to apply retroactively the norm of genocide for social and political groups) were recognized as unconstitutional.[...]
Internet: https://doi.org/10.7220/2029-4239.14.6
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/32494/1/ISSN2029-4239_2016_N_2_14.PG_98-114.pdf
https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/32494
https://doi.org/10.7220/2029-4239.14.6
Affiliation(s): Teisės fakultetas
Viešosios teisės katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Teisės apžvalga / Law Review 2016, nr. 2(14)
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml9.52 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

116
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Download(s)

40
checked on Aug 17, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.