Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31849
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Gelūnas, Arūnas
Title: Vieno konflikto istorija
Other Title: The history of a conflict
Is part of: Darbai ir dienos, 2005, nr. 41, p. 57-65
Date: 2005
Abstract: The article deals with the centuries-old disagree-ment between art and philosophy, its first and best known testimony being Plato's decision to get rid of the artists in his "The Republic". However, the ąuestion is raised, whether this conflict is a fundamentai one. What are the major points of disagreement? Could there be possibilities for agreement inherent in the very structure of these disciplines? What shape does this conflict take in the Modern times? To answer these ąuestions, the article considers the ąuotation from Gadamer, Hei-degger and Jaspers - influential modern thinkers on "philosophy and art". The dichotomy between the work of intellect and the work of intuition, brought about by Henri Bergson, is visualized by means of the visual metaphor of "circle and sąuare". The concluding remark is well summarized in Vladimir Nabokov's dictum: "There is no art without facts and there is no science without fancy".
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/31849
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31849
Appears in Collections:Darbai ir dienos / Deeds and Days 2005, nr. 41

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

86
checked on Nov 5, 2019

Download(s)

80
checked on Nov 5, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.