Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31842
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Klibavičius, Darius
Title: Autentiško sąmonės atvirumo beieškant (Šarūno Saukos ir Algimanto Švėgždos vizualumo refleksijos)
Other Title: In search of an authentic openness of consciousness (reflection in the visual discourse of Šarūnas Sauka and Algimantas Švėgžda)
Is part of: Darbai ir dienos, 2005, nr. 41, p. 81-94
Date: 2005
Abstract: The article deals with the problem of consciousness, which is described by the criteria of authenticity. The main methodological opposition is concentrated on the categories of cynicism and sincerity, with the help of which visual discourses of painters Šarūnas Sauka (born in 1958) and Algimantas Jonas Švėgžda (1941-1996) are analysed. As the visual discourses described in the article express existential attitudes, they are interpreted by the means of philosophical reflection. Methodologically cynicism is characterised as enlightened falše consciousness, while sincerity is described as enlightened "right" consciousness. In the article cynicism is presented as pūrely theoretical and far away from reality, aesthetised, self-aimed as well as a position of discontent and disillusion. Sincerity is introduced as the way of immediate and personai relation fulfillment and direction of consciousness into meditation practice. Cynicism is the substitutional form of openness closely related to the destructive strategies of postmodernism and solely relation sincerity is the only authentically possible form of consciousness openness. From the point of view of discourse, cynicism actualises itself by widely discussing the problem of Identifi¬cation, i.e. by numerous narratives of self-portrait multiplications and the analysis of corporeality. Meanwhile sincerity serves as a quiet method of world contemplation; moreover it is based on ex-perience rather than theoretical position. From this viewpoint priority is given not to gnoseological consciousness (enlightened and falše cognition), but to ontological consciousness (present in the light of revelation). On the intersection of two different paradigms it becomes clear that Š.Sauka creates ūgly beauty purposely and A.Švėgžda restrains himself from the action and does not create beauty at all. The article is based on the works of P.Sloterdijk, M.Buber, T.Bewes and others.
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/31842
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31842
Appears in Collections:Darbai ir dienos / Deeds and Days 2005, nr. 41

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

72
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.