Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorСеливачев, Михаил
dc.description.abstractThe report reveals the significance of the author of Dead souls as a predictor of several new artistic trends and as a pioneer in the development of scientific аrt history in Russian Empire. It was in Gogol’s texts that the “live things” became important “personages”, sometimes much more expressive, than the acting heroes themselves. But even the best critics, such as Vissarion Belinski or Vladimir Stasov, initially did not accept his historical and theoretical works about art, architecture, geography etc., supposing them to be naïve and juvenile. One may say that the “live things” were obscured by the shadow of Dead souls for too long. Nevertheless, an artistic language, created by Gogol, had a strong influence not only on his contemporaries, but also on the new generations of intellectuals, even at a greater scale, especially in the second half of 20th century, the time of Marc Chagall and Salvador Dali, when Gogol became comprehended and famous all over the world. Special attention is devoted to Gogol’s thoughts on art. He appreciated forms, which emerged in the framework of Gothic, Islamic, Indian art, while his attitude to Byzantine, Chinese, Renaissance styles was rather sceptical. Gogol proposed the first explanations, why the kitsch phenomenon is so popular (though such a notion was not in use at his time). He is the predecessor of some new concepts, which were later embodied into the poems of acmeist circle, images of Pablo Picasso, several Skansen- and Disneyland-like projects. The idea and the plot of the novel Portrait resembles the Portrait of Dorian Grey, which was written 50 years later. Gogol created the main signs and images of Ukrainian world. Thanks to this author, Ukraine became a sort of Piemont for all of the Russian Empire. Ultimately, he provided an aphoristic definition of the Christian Art, where the seeds of creation are hidden, but not destroying.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofMeno istorija ir kritika, 2011, nr. 7, p. 208-216lt_LT
dc.rightsSutarties data 2006-10-02, nr. LLTI-00001, laisvai prieinamas internetelt_LT
dc.subjectGogol’s textsen_US
dc.subjectArtificial surroundingen_US
dc.title«Живые вещи» Н. Гоголя: искусство и предметная среда в его произведенияхru_RU
dc.title.alternative“Live things” of Nicolas Gogol: art and artificial surrounding in his worksen_US
dc.typeStraipsnis / Article
dc.subject.udc7 Menas / The arts
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Art History & Criticism / Meno istorija ir kritika 2011, nr. 7
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 16, 2021


checked on Jan 16, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.