Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31710
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPilibaitytė, Vaida
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-12T07:38:54Z
dc.date.available2016-09-12T07:38:54Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn2029-8668
dc.identifier.urihttps://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/31710
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/31710-
dc.description.abstractAfter years of stagnation, nuclear energy is believed to experience a revival. Despite a global momentum, little cross-cultural analysis exists about the national drivers for nuclear power such as geopolitics. Discourse studies are emerging as a way to examine approaches on energy security options in different countries. This work documents discourses based on media texts produced in two neighbouring pro-nuclear Eastern European countries Lithuania and Belarus in contrast with the global policy discourse with particular focus on nuclear energy. Discourse analysis conducted in this study relied on Hajer’s analytical concepts – discursive storylines and coalitions. National discourses were studied from 157 media texts published in 2006-2009. National pro-nuclear and anti-nuclear discourse coalitions have been described and compared with those found in the global discourse. The results show that climate change is emphasized internationally, while geopolitics is more important on a national level. Pro-nuclear narratives in both countries promotes nuclear as cheap and reliable, and downplay uncertainties present in the global discourse. The anti-nuclear energy storylines similar to those of global discourse are vocal about risks and lack of public involvement. The study1 concludes that in political discourses like in Lithuania there are more opportunities to challenge dominant narratives than in the technocratic debate taking place in Belarus. However, political and corporate interests coupled with unspecialized reporting have a universally constraining effect on national public discussions on nuclear energy. As a result, significant misinterpretations of global trends and knowledge gaps seem to occur in both types of the national debate.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedia transformations, 2011, vol. 5, p. 66-87lt_LT
dc.rightsSutarties data 2016-07-04, nr. A1609, laisvai prieinamas internetelt_LT
dc.subjectBelarusen_US
dc.subjectDiscourseen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectLithuaniaen_US
dc.subjectMediaen_US
dc.subjectNuclear energyen_US
dc.titleNuclear energy discourses in Lithuania and Belarusen_US
dc.typeStraipsnis / Article
dc.subject.udc316 Sociologija / Sociology
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Media Transformations 2011, vol. 5
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

37
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

37
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.