Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/30908
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Švedaitė-Sakalauskė, Birutė;Buzaitytė-Kašalynienė, Jolita
Title: Socialinis darbas ir galia : teoriniai tyrinėjimų pagrindai
Other Title: Social work and power : theoretical background for research
Is part of: Socialinis darbas. Patirtis ir metodai, 2014, nr. 13(1), p. 9-31
Date: 2014
Abstract: Power and social work are concurrent, because every help (every relation) are always related with power and dependency. A research of phenomenon of power in social work almost hasn’t existed in Lithuania till now. The research could be unfolded on three levels: micro – the level of social work intervention, mezzo – the level of organization of social work, and macro – the level of power of social work profession in the society. The paper aims to discuss fundamental concepts and several theoretical approaches for potential theoretical and empirical research of power in social work. M. Webber’s classical concept of power; N. Elias’ theory of power balance; approaches toward power in theories of games and social exchanges; and systemic-constructivist concept of power are analysed in the paper. Also five forms of social work power, which at the same time are the sources of social work power and the means of exercising the power, are more closely discussed in the paper. These are physical power, economical or instrumental power, authority or relationship power, positional or organizational power, knowledge or definition power. The last one is worth of close analyse, because it can hide, justify, or seek to embed structures of social inequality, injustice, and violations of human rights. And at last from the discussions based on systemic-constructivist perspective in the paper becomes evident that communication about power or power meta-communication is another specific source of power. If the question of power in specific relationship is raised there is no the way back, and nothing can stay as it used to be, because it forces towards a movement and change, which, by the way, can be positive as well as negative. This is one of the reasons, why an analysis of power phenomenon in social work is always relevant and even necessary. 
Straipsnyje pristatomos keturios skirtingos galios teorinės paradigmos (M. Weberio galios apibrėžtis, N. Eliaso galios balansų teorija, lošimų teorijos bei socialinių mainų teorijos požiūris į galią, sisteminė-konstruktyvistinė galios koncepcija), siekiant atverti galimybes galios fenomeno dirbant socialinį darbą empirinei analizei. Taip pat straipsnyje išryškinamos esminės socialinio darbo galios formos ir priemonės: fizinė galia, ekonominė galia, autoriteto, arba santykio galia, pozicinė, arba organizacinė galia bei žinojimo/definicijos galia.
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/30908
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/30908
Appears in Collections:Socialinis darbas. Patirtis ir metodai / Social Work. Experience and Methods 2014, nr. 13 (1)

Files in This Item:
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

243
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

337
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.