Kardomųjų priemonių tikslų ir įtariamojo procesinio statuso įgijimo santykio problematika
| Author | Affiliation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mykolo Romerio universitetas |
| Date |
|---|
2011 |
Straipsnyje analizuojama Lietuvos bei uţsienio šalių baudţiamojo proceso teisės doktrinoje esanti kardomųjų priemonių sąvoka, kurios pagrindinis elementas yra kardomųjų priemonių tikslai. Detali kiekvieno tikslo analizė leidţia atskleisti tikrąją kardomųjų priemonių instituto paskirtį jo taikymo galimybes ir apribojimus. Straipsnyje analizuojant kardomosios priemonės skyrimo procedūrą bei atskirose jos stadijose sprendţiamus klausimus, iškeliama kardomosios priemonės skyrimo galimumo ir tikslingumo problematika. Statistinių duomenų bei konkrečių baudţiamųjų bylų analizė leidţia atskleisti susiformavusią ydingą praktiką, kuomet įtariamojo procesinio statuso įgijimas "automatiškai" nulemia kardomosios priemonės paskyrimą, net neanalizuojant jos skyrimo tikslingumo.
The article analyzes the Lithuanian and foreign criminal law doctrine in the concept of supervision measures, which are a key element in supervision measures purposes. The comparison of various supervision measures concepts leads to the conclusion that the unrestricted criminal procedure and the offender's participation in criminal procedure on the objectives of pre-trial supervision measures are typical in many countries criminal proceedings. Such a concept of comparative analysis also confirms the trend of democratic states, pre-trial preventive measures aim - to prevent further offenses - are in the background, or it is generally denied, or pre-trial preventive measures aim is seeking in exceptional cases. This situation is explained by the fact that supervision measures goals are similar to the goals of punishment and subjects applying the supervision measures are approaching to the restriction of human rights and liberties, and their violation. Detailed analysis of each objective enables to reveal the true purpose of the supervision measures institute‘s applicability and limitations. The articles puts forward a proposal that looking for an optimal unrestricted pre-trial, the trial and execution of the sentence of achievement of target, and minimize individual liberties and rights violation, there is a possibility to supplement the Criminal Procedure Code of Republic of Lithuania. It should be provided for the possibility that the suspect (accused) on any of the nine pre-trial supervision measures should be given additional restrictions - a prohibition from visiting certain places or not searching for a contact with certain persons. It would be quite an effective alternative to more restrictive supervision measures place a person a lighter supervision measure and remand it with the additional restrictions.[...]