Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/1216
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Ekonomika / Economics (S004)
Author(s): Kisieliauskas, Justinas;Starkauskienė, Viktorija
Title: Visuotinis pažangos indeksas
Other Title: Universal progress indicator
Is part of: Taikomoji ekonomika: sisteminiai tyrimai = Applied economics: systematic research. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, T. 6, nr. 1 (2012)
Extent: p. 13-24
Date: 2012
Keywords: Šalies vystymasis;Vystymosi rodikliai;Visuotinis Pažangos indeksas;Development;Development indicators;Universal Progress indicator
Abstract: Straipsnyje sisteminami labiausiai paplitę, tačiau kritikuotini valstybės pažangos (vystymosi) matavimo rodikliai. Eigoje siūloma alternatyvi – pagrindinius kritikuotinų rodiklių trūkumus švelninanti ir naujus, svarbius rodiklius apimanti, valstybės vystymosi matavimo metodika – kuria remiantis galima nustatyti atskiros šalies išsivystymą. Tai Visuotinis Pažangos indeksas (VPI) - kuris šalies pažangą matuoja per ekonominę, socialinę, politinę bei aplinkos prizmes
Progress indication, as a result of development, is very important topic for nowadays economists and economy as science. Existing indicators are being criticized for not matching the definition of real country progress and newly created are too simple or too complex to reflect phenomena of development. For this reason, the main topic and problem of this work is what do we mean by the word group „country development“, what compounds it and finally when we realize it, how can we measure it. In the first part of this work the definition of development and progress is being analyzed. The change of development phenomena during the time, there is also showed. The most typical change have been seen in interpretation of development which changed from quantitative to quantitative and qualitative. After a deep investigation in science literature, work shows that development can be traced into progress of four dimensions: economical, social, political and environmental. In the end of this part most popular indicators of progress (used in real life) are being criticized. Work reveals weak parts of such indicators as GDP, Human development indicator (HDI), Physical Quality of Life Index (PQLI), Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) and Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI). As all criticism was shown in the first part, authors of this article, on behalf of development or progress (there words are used as synonyms) interpretation – build progress measurement mechanism using most popular indicators such as GDP or HDI, by covering their disadvantages with newly added environment and income distribution factors and adding new dimensions in accordance to the progress interpretation used in analysis. In this way the alternative method of measuring country progress has been created. [...]
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/1216/1/ISSN1822-7996_2012_V_6.N_1.PG_13-24.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/1216
Affiliation(s): Ekonomikos katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Taikomoji ekonomika: sisteminiai tyrimai / Applied Economics: Systematic Research 2012, nr. 6(1)
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

43
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

251
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.