Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/111601
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science (S1)
Field of Science: Miškotyra / Forestry (A004)
Author(s): Biber, Peter;Felton, Adam;Nieuwenhuis, Maarten;Lindbladh, Matts;Black, Kevin;Bahýl, Ján;Bingöl, Özkan;Borges, José G;Botequim, Brigite;Brukas, Vilis;Bugalho, Miguel N;Corradini, Giulia;Eriksson, Ljusk Ola;Forsell, Nicklas;Hengeveld, Geerten M;Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A;Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan;Karahalil, Uzay;Lodin, Isak;Lundholm, Anders;Makrickiene, Ekaterina;Masiero, Mauro;Mozgeris, Gintautas;Pivoriūnas, Nerijus;Poschenrieder, Werner;Pretzsch, Hans;Sedmák, Róbert;Tuček, Jan
Title: Forest biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and wood production: modeling synergies and trade-offs for ten forest landscapes across Europe
Is part of: Frontiers in ecology and evolution Lausanne : Frontiers media S.A., 2020, vol. 8
Extent: p. 1-21
Date: 2020
Note: Article no. 547696
Keywords: Ecosystem services;Biodiversity;Wood production;Carbon sequestration;Forest management;Sustainability;Simulation;Europe
Abstract: Europe's forests provide vital habitat for biodiversity and essential ecosystem services whose provision must be sustained or enhanced over the coming century. However, the potential to secure or increase forest ecosystem services, while securing the habitat requirements of taxa remains unclear, especially within the context of uncertain climate and socio-economic developments. To tease out the associated trade-offs and synergies, we used 10 case study landscapes within nine countries throughout Europe. Starting with the current status of the forests in the case study landscapes, we simulated forest development 100 years into the future. Simulations were embedded in three combined climate and socio-economic frame scenarios based on global and European policies which varied in their climate change mitigation efficiency. Scenarios were translated into country specific projections of climate variables, and resultant demands for wood products. Forest management regimes were projected to vary in response to these scenarios at local scales. The specific combinations of alternative forest management practices were based on parallel research and input from local forest stakeholders. For each case study, a specific forest growth simulator was used. In general, the climate scenarios applied did not cause fundamentally different ecosystem service outputs at the case study level. Our results revealed almost no reduction in outcomes for biodiversity indicators with an increase in wood production, and in some cases synergistic results occurred when diversity was actively promoted as part of the management concept. Net carbon uptake was not strongly correlated with biodiversity, indicating that biodiversity-friendly forest management doesn't need to curtail carbon sequestration. Notably, we obtained heterogeneous results for the relation between sustainable wood production and net carbon uptake.[...]
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/111601/2/ISSN2296-701X_2020_V_8.PG_1-21.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/111601
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.547696
Affiliation(s): Miškų ir ekologijos fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:1. Straipsniai / Articles
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 5

4
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Page view(s)

26
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

10
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons