Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/110652
Type of publication: Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or / and Scopus (S1)
Field of Science: Informatika / Informatics (N009)
Author(s): Trzcionka, Agata;Narbutaitė, Rūta;Pranckevičienė, Alma;Maskeliūnas, Rytis;Damaševičius, Robertas;Narvydas, Gintautas;Połap, Dawid;Mocny-Pachońska, Katarzyna;Wozniak, Marcin;Tanasiewicz, Marta
Title: In vitro analysis of quality of dental adhesive bond systems applied in various conditions
Is part of: Coatings. Basel: MDPI AG, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 9
Extent: p. 1-10
Date: 2020
Keywords: Adhesive dentistry;Dental materials;Microleakage;Restorative dentistry
Abstract: There are several methods of reducing a microleakage, and one of them is choosing appropriate adhesive material. The aim of the work was the in vitro analysis of 4 bonds: 3M ESPE “Single bond”, Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”, Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal”, and Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. Material and methods: 136 healthy molar teeth were collected and randomly split into 4 groups and Vth Class cavities were prepared. Chosen adhesives were used in four groups of teeth with the same composite. Teeth were the thermocycled, sealed, covered with lacquer, and submerged in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h. After the thermocycling, the vertices of each tooth were sealed using dental wax. Each tooth was then fully covered with lacquer. All teeth were then submerged into 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h in room temperature. In the next step they were transversely cut through a center of restoration. The Olympus BX43 microscope was used to photograph each cut tooth. With the usage of Olympus stream software, measurement of the dye’s leakage was performed. Results. The statistical analysis proved that the most effective material when applied to ideally prepared cavity surface was Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”. The second material was 3M ESPE “Single Bond”, third—Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal” and fourth—Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. The most effective material applied to a too-dry surface was Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”, second—3M ESPE “Single Bond”, third—Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal” and fourth—Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. When it comes to too damp surfaces the best results were obtained with Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active” then Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal”, 3M ESPE “Single Bond” and Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”
Internet: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090891
Affiliation(s): Informatikos fakultetas
Kauno technologijos universitetas
Lietuvos Sveikatos mokslų universitetas
Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas
Taikomosios informatikos katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml8.23 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.